Telangana High Court
WP/36805/2021 of E. Srinivas Vs The Telangana State Road Transport Corporation and 4 Others on 30 December 2021
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEIVIBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI WRIT PETITION NO: 36805 oF 2021 Between: !,,Sriryvgs, S/ o. Chandraiah Aged about 31 years, Ex.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEIVIBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT PETITION NO: 36805 oF 2021
Between:
!,,Sriryvgs, [S/ ][o. ][Chandraiah ][Aged about 31 years, ][Ex. Contract ]Conductor, C-982065 Ranigunj-l Bus Depot, Secunderabad, Telangana State.
.,,PETITIONER
AND
1. The Telangana.State Road Transport Corporation, Rep. by its ManagingDirector, Bus Bhavan, Musheerabad, T.S.Director, Bus Bhavan, Musheerabad, T.S.
2. The Executive Director (cHZ), TSRTC, JBS, [picket, ]Secunderabad, T.S.
3. The Regional Manager, TSRTC, Secunderabad Region at Secunderabad, T.S
4. The Depot Manager, TSRTC, Ranigunj-l Bus Depot, Secunderabad, T.S.
5. The Depot Manager, TSRTC, HCU Bus Depot, Gachibowli, Hyderabad, T.S.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ ofmandamus declaring that the action of the 2nd respondent herein in not consideringmy representation dt.51712017 is bad arbitrary and illegal and consequently direct themy representation dt.51712017 is bad arbitrary and illegal and consequently direct therespondents to pass appropriate orders for allowing the petitioner into duty orcommunicate the petitioner Termination order forthwith.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P. VENKATESWAR RAO
Counsel for the Respondents: N.PRAVEEN REDDY, SC FOR TSRTC
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE [S ][RI ]JUSTICE [ABHINAND ][KUMAR SFIAVILI]
,lw.P.N[()-3]05F 2
A&DER:
Learned [, ][rounsel ][appearing ][for ][the ][petitioner ][seeks]permission [to vithdraw ][the ][writ ][petition ][with ][liberry ][to ][the]petitioner [to ][pu ][sue ][his ][remedies ][in ][accordance ][with ][lau"]
Reserving [such ][liberty, ][the ][Writ ][Petition ][is ][dismissed ][as]withdrawn. [Nc ][costs.]
Miscellar eous [petitions, ][if ][any, pending ][shall ][stand]
closed.
SD/.K.ONESIMASSISTANT [REGISTRAR],TRUE [COPY//]hSECTION [OFFICER]
To,1. One [CC ][to SRI ][P ][VENKATESWAR RAO' Advocate ][[OPUCI]ne CC [to SRI ][N ][PRAVEEN REDDY' SC ][FOR ][TSRTC ][[OPUCI]3. Two [CD ][Copies']
4. One [spare ][coPY']
ug,#
HIGH COURT
DATED:3011212021
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
WP.No.36805 [of ][2021]
DISMISS!NG [C ][F ][THE ][WRIT ][PETITION]AS WITHDRA\VN [WITHOUT ][COSTS.]
1[i\e ][STAIE]():J2I [JAN ][2022]?,a,foa !D:.i \-