Telangana High Court
WP/27929/2007 of Pallapati Munemma W/o Narayana Reddy Vs The Commissioner of Endowments Department, on 27 December 2007
SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.27929 of 2007 Dated: 27.12.2007 Between Pallapati Munemma …Petitioner And The Commissioner of Endowments Department, Govt. of A.P., Boggulakunta, Hyderabad and others. …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA WRIT
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA
WRIT PETITION No.27929 of 2007
Dated: 27.12.2007
Between
Pallapati Munemma
…Petitioner
And
The Commissioner of Endowments Department,Govt. of A.P., Boggulakunta, Hyderabad and others.
…Respondents
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA
WRIT PETITION No.27929 of 2007
ORDER:
The matter is coming up for admission.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also thelearned Assistant Government Pleader for Endowments representingrespondent Nos.1 and 2 and Sri V.T.M.Prasad, learned counselrepresenting respondent No.3.
The learned counsel for the petitioner had taken this Courtthrough the contents of the affidavit filed in support of the writ petitionand would submit that though the revision petition is pending beforethe first respondent, there is threat of dispossession. It is also broughtto the notice of this Court that similar matters had been disposed ofwith suitable directions.
This writ petition is filed for issuance of writ of mandamusdeclaring the action of the third respondent in trying to destroy the cropand dispossess the petitioner though Revision Petition No.6 of 2003 ispending before the first respondent, as arbitrary, illegal and void and topass such other suitable orders.
Several facts had been narrated in the affidavit filed in supportof the writ petition.
Since it is stated that Revision Petition No.6 of 2003 is pendingdisposal before the first respondent, let the first respondent dispose ofthe same, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of acopy of this order. Till then, status quo, obtaining as on today, shall bemaintained.
The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. There shall be noorder as to costs.
Date: 27.12.2007va
_________________
P.S.Narayana, J