Telangana High Court

WP/44629/2017 of SYED WASIM AHMED Vs STATE OF TELANGANA on 28 December 2017

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CHALLA KODANDA RAM W.P.No.44629 OF 2017 ORDER This writ petition is filed for the following relief: “…to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the 2nd respondent in considering the

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM

W.P.No.44629 OF 2017

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

This writ petition is filed for the following relief:

“…to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the 2[nd]respondent in considering the petitioner application dated 13.11.2017 for mutation of property in municipal records as per A.P. Municipalities Act, 1965 and “Alteration of Ownership of Property In Assessment Book Rules, 1966” as arbitrary, illegal, and violation of Article 300-A of the Constitution of India,. consequently, direct the 2[nd] respondent to consider the petitioner’s application dated 13.11.2017 for mutation of property in the Municipal records as per A.P. Municipalities Act, 1965 and “Alteration of Ownership of Property in Assessment Book Rules, 1966” and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.”

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development appearing for the 1[st] respondent and learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 2[nd] respondent.

It is the case of the petitioner that he purchased the property viz., H.No.7-1-50 admeasuring 173.33 square yards or 144.92 square meters situated at Ward No.7, Block No.1, Municipal Quarters, Dwarak Nagar, Adilabad, under a registered sale deed on 6.11.2017. Thereafter, he made a representation dated 13.11.2017

before the 2[nd] respondent for mutating his name in the revenue records in terms of the A.P. Municipalities Act, 1965, but no action has been taken been so far.

Sri N.Praveen Kumar, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 2[nd] respondent submits that necessary action would be taken on the representation submitted by the petitioner.

In those circumstances, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the 2[nd] respondent to act upon the representation dated 13.11.2017 made by the petitioner for mutation of his name in the revenue records, in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.

28[th] December, 2017 rkk

_________________________________ JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead