Telangana High Court
WP/9760/2011 of RUKUNINI TRAVELS PVT LTD, HYD Vs PRL SECY, DEPT OF TRANSPORT, HYD AND 3 OTHERS on 29 December 2017
THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO.9760 OF 2011 ORDER: Sri B.Nalin Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive necessitating further adjudication by this Court. The Writ Petition is, therefore,
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
WRIT PETITION NO.9760 OF 2011
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Sri B.Nalin Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive necessitating further adjudication by this Court.
The Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand dismissed.
_________________________________ (RAMESH RANGANATHAN, ACJ)
29[th] December 2017 RRB