Telangana High Court
SA/373/2013 of Anumalla Lasumamma, Vs Boga Laxmi, on 30 December 2021
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.LAXMAN Appeal under Section '100 of CPC against the Judgment and decree made in AS No.16/2009 daled 1411112012 on the file of the Court of the ll
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENTTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.LAXMAN
SECOND APPEAL NO: 373 OF 2013
Appeal under Section ['100 ]of CPC against the Judgment and decree made in ASNo.16/2009 daled 1411112012 on the file of the Court of the ll Additional District Judge,Karimnagar at Jagtial preferred against the decree in OS No.'1 42 of 2002 dated2311112009 on the file of the Court of the Principal Junior [-Civil ]Judge, Jagtial,Karimnagar District.
Between:
Anumalla Lasumamma, W/o. Linganna, Occ: Household, RJo. Jabithapur, tr/.R.Jagtiai,Karimnagar District.
...PETITIONERYAPPELLANT
AND
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Boga Laxmi, W/o. Late Lachanna, Occ:Household, Fl/o. H.No. 2-2-198, JagllalProper, M. R.Jagtial, Karimnagar District.Proper, M. R.Jagtial, Karimnagar District.
2. Boga Chandramouli, S/o. Late Lachanna, Occ:Business, Rl/o. H.No.2-2-198,Jagtial Proper, I\/.R.Jagtial, Karimnagar District.Jagtial Proper, I\/.R.Jagtial, Karimnagar District.
3. Boga Ramesh, S/o. Late Lachanna, R/o. H.Ng. 2-2-198, Jagtial Proper,lril.R.Jagtial, Karimnagar District.lril.R.Jagtial, Karimnagar District.
(Note: Respondents No.1 & 2 are not "..".::HfS$8i5.=,1f.p,fr,[3[t*o=*r,"..".::HfS$8i5.=,1f.p,fr,[3[t*o=*r, SAMP- NO: 1 01 1 0F 2013
Petition under Order 39 Rule I and 2 read with Section ['1 ]51 of CPC [praying]that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may [be]pleased to grant temporary injunction reslratning the Respondent No.3 not to alienateor change the nature and character of suit open site measuring 154 Sq.Yardscovered by Ir/unicipal No.1-2-6 [Old], 1-2-65 [New] at [vlarkandeya Street, Jagtial,l\/.R.Jagtial, Karimangar District, pending disposal of SA No. of 2013 filed by thepetitioner in the interest of justice.
For the Appellant : SRI P.V.NARAYANA RAO, Advocate (not [present)]
Forthe Respondents: NO ONE APPEARED
The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT
Ij
To
.I'HE IIONOURAtsLE SRI JUSTICE M. LAXMAN
SECOND APPEAL No.373 0F 2013
JUDGME NT:
There is no representation for the appellant. Direction given by this Court on29.10.2021 and 30.11.2021 is not complied rvith.
2. Therefore, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending, shall stand closed.
Sd/-K-SRINIVASA [RAO]JolNrftFGlsrRAR\
//TRUE COPY'
SECTION OFFICER
1. The Hon'ble llAdditional [District Judge, Karimnagar ][at ][Jagtial']
The Hon'ble i. iii; H;;'bE [Principal ][civil ][Judse, Jabtial, Karimnasar District']
5. Onu CC to Sri [P.V.Narayana ][Rao, ][Advocate (OPUC)]
Onu CC to Sri CC to Sri 4. Two CD CoPies t
5. One Spare [CoPY]
Kj.
HIGH COURT
DATED:3011212021
JUDGMENTSA.No.373 of 2013
DISMISSING THE SA FOR [NON-PROSECUTION.]
\e [STA ][r€]1_)?5 'tunzuzz
/c