Telangana High Court
CC/1324/2022 of Kallepu Vidyasagar Rao And Another Vs Sri. Krishna Aditya And Another on 30 December 2022
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1324OF 2022 Contempt case under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to Punish the Respondents herein for
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWOTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1324OF 2022
Contempt case under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act toPunish the Respondents herein for violating, disobeying the Orders of the HighCourt dated. 17.O9.2021 W.P.No. 22581 of 2021 .
Between:
1. Kallepu Vidyasagar Rao, S/o. Madhava Rao, Age. 56 years, Occ.Agricultureand Business, R/o. H.No. 2-9-446, Snehanagar, HanamkondaWarangalDistrict.and Business, R/o. H.No. 2-9-446, Snehanagar, HanamkondaWarangalDistrict.
2. Kallepu Sumalatha, W/o. Vidyasagar Rao, Age- 48 Years, Occ. Housewife,Rl/o. H.No. 2-9-446, Snehanagar, Hanamkonda, Warangal District.Rl/o. H.No. 2-9-446, Snehanagar, Hanamkonda, Warangal District.
... PETITIONERYPETITION ERS.
AND
1. Sri. Krishna Aditya, The District Collector, Mulugu District, Mulugu
2. Sri. Satyanarayana Swamy, The Tahsildar and Joint Sub Registrar, Mulugu,Mulugu Proper, Mandal and DistrictMulugu Proper, Mandal and District
...RESPONDENTS/REPONDENTS No's. 2 AND 3
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. K VENUMADHAV
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: G.P. for Revenue.
The Court made the following: ORDER
\
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY
CONTEMPTCASEN o.L324 of 2022
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Contempt Case is filed alleging willful disobedience tothe order dated 17.09.2021 passed by this Court in W.p.No.225B1of2021,.the order dated 17.09.2021 passed by this Court in W.p.No.225B1of2021,.
The respondent No.2 has filed a counter_affidavit statingthat the online applications of the petitioners were alreadythat the online applications of the petitioners were alreadyconsidered and rejected oide order dated 1g.06.2021 i.e., muchprior to the order dated 17.09.2021 passed by this Court in thewrit petition.prior to the order dated 17.09.2021 passed by this Court in thewrit petition.
Having regard to the abovg this Contempt Case is closedleaving it open to the petitioners to challenge the order dated18.06.2027 before appropriate forum, if they are so aggrieved.
Miscellaneous Applications, if any pending, shall alsostand closed. There shall be no order as to costs_
.Sd/. T.SRINIVASDEPUTYAEGISTRAR//TRUE COPY//L'1)'--SECTION OFFICER
To, 1. Two CCs to G.P. for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana' atHyderabad (OUT)
2. Ohe CC to SRl. K VENUMADHAV, Advocate [OPUC]3. Two CD Copiespr \i \:
HIGH COURTDATED:3011212022
1LCt.a,^i{sI:rti--_ta6cri*ORDER.,$;-/CC.No.1324 of 2022
CLOSTIIG THE CONTEMPT CASE\\