Telangana High Court
WP/28027/2007 of K.A.P. Thrimurthulu S/o Satyanarayana Vs The Director of Town and Country Planning, on 28 December 2007
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 28027 of 2007 28.12.2007 Between: K.A.P. Thrimurthulu … Petitioner AND The Director of Town and Country Planning, Govt. of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad & others … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri P.R.K. Amarendra Kumar Counsel
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
WRIT PETITION No. 28027 of 2007
28.12.2007
Between:
K.A.P. Thrimurthulu
… Petitioner
AND
The Director of Town and Country Planning,Govt. of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad & others … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri P.R.K. Amarendra Kumar Counsel for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 : Assistant Government Pleader for Municipal Administration Counsel for respondent No.3 : Sri S. Nageswara Reddy
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R:
This writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus to declare theinaction of respondent No.1 in considering proposals submitted by thepetitioner through respondent No.3 vide proceedings Roc. No.2524/01/G1 dated 18.06.2007 for approval of final layout in respect of land covered in R.S. No. 449/1P of Bhimavaram as illegaland arbitrary.
Heard Sri P.R.K. Amarendra Kumar, learned counsel for thepetitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for MunicipalAdministration for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and Sri S. NageswaraReddy, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.3.
The only grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is thatthough a tentative layout was approved on 03.09.2001 and theapplication filed by him for granting approval of final layout wasforwarded by the Commissioner (in-charge), Bhimavaram Municipalityto respondent No.1 through respondent No.2 on 18.06.2007, so far noorders have been passed by respondent No.1 in that regard.
In the above circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of withthe direction to respondent No.1 to consider and dispose of theproposal for approval of final layout said to have been forwarded byrespondent No.3 vide Roc. No. 2524/01/G1 dated 18.06.2007 within aperiod of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No. 36650of 2007 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of asinfructuous.
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J28.12.2007ksld