Telangana High Court
CRLRC/1176/2005 of Ketha Santhi, Vs Ketha Venkata Ganapathi Rao, on 30 December 2010
SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1176 OF 2005 DATED 30th DECEMBER, 2010. BETWEEN : K.Santhi & others .. Petitioners and 1) Ketha Venkata Ganapathi Rao 2) The State of A.P. ..Respondents THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1176 OF 2005
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGOCRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1176 OF 2005DATED 30[th] DECEMBER, 2010.
BETWEEN :
K.Santhi & others
.. Petitioners
and
1) Ketha Venkata Ganapathi Rao
2) The State of A.P.
..Respondents
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGOCRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1176 OF 2005
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This revision is filed by the petitioners challenging the orderpassed by the learned Magistrate in M.C.No.56 of 2002 on 07.03.2005wherein the learned Magistrate passed an order directing the firstrespondent herein to pay a sum of Rs.3,000/- towards maintenance.
Petitioners filed the present revision in the year 2005.
Learned Senior Counsel submitted that the petition was filed bythe petitioners before the Magistrate Court seeking maintenance ofRs.7,000/-, but without assigning any reasons, the learned Magistratehas ordered only Rs.3,000/-, which is very meagre to maintain thefamily that too along with two children.
After perusal of the records, this Court without going into meritsfurther, is of the view that since the revision is filed in the year 2005after lapse of five years, the said amount of Rs.3,000/- granted towardsmaintenance can be increased to Rs.5,000/-.
Hence, the first respondent herein is directed to pay a sum ofRs.2,500/- to the first petitioner and Rs.1,250/- each to second andthird petitioners towards maintenance. Taking into consideration the lapse of time, the first respondent herein is directed to pay the saidsum of Rs.5,000/- from the month of January, 2011.
At this stage, learned Senior Counsel submitted that arrearswere also not paid by the first respondent herein. In such a situation,petitioners are at liberty to claim the same before the concern Court. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of.
Dated : 30.12.2010sur
________________________JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO