Telangana High Court
WP/25717/2002 of Proritor Smt. K. Shruthi Vs The Superindent Police on 27 December 2004
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 25717 of 2002 Between: Venkateswara Bar & Restaurant, Rep. By its Proprietor
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM
WRIT PETITION NO : 25717 of 2002
Between:
Venkateswara Bar & Restaurant,
Rep. By its Proprietor Smt. K. Shruthi R/o 3-91, Saroor nagar, Ranga Reddy District.
AND
..... PETITIONER
The Superindent of Police, Ranga Reddy Disttrict, Lakadikapul, Ranga Reddy District.
.....RESPONDENT
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased toissue a Writ order direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamusdeclaring the action of the respondent herein in not granting amusement Licence infavour of the petitioner by keeping pending the applications dt 9-1-2002 and 13-12-2002 as illegal improper and unjust and consequently direct the respondent hereinto grant the Amusement Licence and permit the petitioner to conduct musical(orchestra) in 3-91, Saroornagar, ranga Reddy District here after.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SMT.A.PADMA
Counsel for the Respondent : GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER:
It is represented by Smt.A.Padma, learned counsel for the petitioner, that the causein the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
____________
27-12-2004
vs
To
1. The Superindent of Police, Ranga Reddy Disttrict, Lakadikapul, Ranga Reddy District. Lakadikapul, Ranga Reddy District.
2. 2CCs to the G.P for Home, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad(O.U.T).
3. 2CD copies.