Telangana High Court

WP/36920/2024 of M.Karthik Reddy Vs State of Telangana on 31 December 2024

Cites 0, Cited by 0

S/o M.Srinivas R 34- 631191176/1, Sri Ramanapuram, Rama HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRry FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION NO: 36920 OF 2024 [ 3168 ]

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY,THE THIRry FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FOUR

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

WRIT PETITION NO: 36920 OF 2024

Between:

M.Karthik Reddy, S/o M.Srinivas [R],eddy, [Aged ][40 ][Years,]R/o34- 631191176/1, Sri Ramanapuram, Ramanthapur, Hyderabad-5000'1 3

...PETITIONER

AND

'1. State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Sefcretary, [Municipal Administration]and Urban Development Departrnent, SecnHyderabad'tariat, State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Sefcretary, [Municipal Administration]and Urban Development Departrnent, SecnHyderabad'tariat, 2. The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its Commissioner,Tank Bund Road, HyderabadTank Bund Road, Hyderabad

3. The Commissioner, The Greater Hyderaba<I [Municipal Corporation, Circle-ll,]Uppal, HyderabadUppal, Hyderabad

4. Sri Kancharla Dileep Kumar, S/o. Late Kancharla [Buchi Ramutu, All are Age]Majors, Rl/o. H.No.24-56, Gandhi Nagar, [U]bpal [(V), ][Uppal Mandal, Medchal-]Malkajgiri District.Majors, Rl/o. H.No.24-56, Gandhi Nagar, [U]bpal [(V), ][Uppal Mandal, Medchal-]Malkajgiri District.

5. Sri Nethi Santhosh Kumar, S/o.Late Nethi [h]lrishna [Murthy, All are Age Majors,]Rio. H.No.24-56, Gandhi Nagar, Uppal [(V)]I [Uppal Mandal, Medchal-]Malkajgiri District.Rio. H.No.24-56, Gandhi Nagar, Uppal [(V)]I [Uppal Mandal, Medchal-]Malkajgiri District.

6. Sri L.Satyanaryana, S/o.L.Krishna Murthy, [/]\ll [are ][Age ][Majors, R/o. ][H.No.24-]56, Gandhi Nagar, Uppal [(V), ]Uppal Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District.56, Gandhi Nagar, Uppal [(V), ]Uppal Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District.

7. Sri Bussa Srinivas, S/o. Late Bussa Rama Chandraiah [All ][are ][Age ][Majors,]R/o. H.No.24-56, Gandhi Nagar, Uppal [(V), Uppal Mandal, Medchal-]Malkajgiri District.R/o. H.No.24-56, Gandhi Nagar, Uppal [(V), Uppal Mandal, Medchal-]Malkajgiri District.

8. Sri Narsaiah, S/o. K.Venkaiah [All ][are ][Age ][Majors, R/o. H-No.2-4-56' Gandhi]Nagar, Uppal (V), Uppal Mandal, Medc-hal-Malkajgiri [District.]Nagar, Uppal (V), Uppal Mandal, Medc-hal-Malkajgiri [District.]

9. Sri Chukka Reddy Kethi Reddy, S/o. Malla [Reddy ][Kethi Reddy ][R/9.{ ]ry9.2- .fi-126n6, Nearby Ganesh Telmple, Sri Ragaveridra [Nagar Uppal ]M, [Uppal]Mandal, Medchal-{Vlalkajgiri District.fi-126n6, Nearby Ganesh Telmple, Sri Ragaveridra [Nagar Uppal ]M, [Uppal]Mandal, Medchal-{Vlalkajgiri District.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may bepleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writof Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.2 to 3 and its officials innot taking any action against the unauthorized construction as illegal, arbitrary andof Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.2 to 3 and its officials innot taking any action against the unauthorized construction as illegal, arbitrary andcontrary to the GHMC Act and further direct the Respondent No.2 to 3 to demolishthe construction in accordance with the Act.the construction in accordance with the Act.

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to directthe Respondent No. 2 to 3 to take immediate action against the illegal constructionmade by Respondent No.4, pending disposal of the above writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. M SRIKANTH

counsel for the Respondent No.l: Gp FoR MUNrclpAL ADMlNrsrRATroNAND URBAN DEVELOPMENTAND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 & 3: SRI p. SRINIVAS RAO,S.C. FOR GREATER HYDERABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS.C. FOR GREATER HYDERABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 to 9: ---The Court made the following: ORDERThe Court made the following: ORDER

HON'BLE [SRI JUSTICE ][K. ][LIIKSHMAN]

WRIT PETITION [No][.36920 ][of2024]

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Heard learned [counsel appearing ][for ][the ][petitioner']

learned Assistant [Government ][Pleader ][for ][Municipal]Administration [and ][Urban ][Development ][appearing ][for]No.l [and ][Sri ][Srinivas Rao ][Pachwa' ][learned]respondent Standing [Counsel appearing ][for ][respondent ][Nos'2 ][and ][3']Perused the [record.]

2. Inviewo[thenatureofreliefsoughtbythepetitioner'this Writ [Petition ][is ][disposed ][of ][at ][the ][admission ][stage]dispensing [with ][notice to respondent Nos'4 to ][9']

3. Petitioner [is ][resident ][of Sri ][Ramanapuram']Ramanthapur [in ][Uppal' ][Respondent ][Nos'4 ][to 9 ][are ][making]constructions [without ][leaving ][setbacks ][in ][uppal' ][Therefore']has [submitted ][a ][representation' ][dated]petitioner 12.12.2024 [to ][respondent ][No'2 ][with ][a ][request ][to ][take]action against [respondent Nos'4 to ][9' ][Despite receiving and]acknowledging [the ][said ][representation' respondent ][No'2]

did not act upon the same. Aggrieved by the said inaction ofrespondent No.2, petitioner filed the present writ petition.

4. Whereas, Sri Srinivas Rao Pachwa, Srinivas Rao Pachwa, Rao Pachwa, learned StandingCounsel appearing for respondent Nos.2 and 3, oninstructions, would submit that respondent No.2 willconsider the said representation dated 12.L2.2O24submitted by the petitioner and take action againstrespondent Nos.4 to 9 strictly in accordance with theprocedure laid down under the Greater HyderabadMunicipal C:orporations Act, 1955 (for short [.the ]Ar:t, 1955,)by putting the petitioner and respondent Nos.4 to 9 onnotice and affording them an opportunity of hearing.

Whereas, Sri Srinivas Rao Pachwa, Srinivas Rao Pachwa, Rao Pachwa, learned Standing

5. In the light of the said submissions, this Writ petitionis disposed of directing respondent No.2 to consider therepresentation, dated 12.12.2024 submitted theby petitioner and take action against respondent Nos.4 to 9strictly in accordance with the procedure laid down underthe Act, 191i5, by putting the petitioner and respondentNos.4 to 9 (rn notice and affording them an opportunit5z ffiffi:-"]r'

,,

I

,l

J

KL,J

within a period [of ][four ][(4) ][weeks ][from ][the ][date of receipt ][of]a copy of this [order. There shall ][be ][no ][order ][as ][to ][costs']

I\

As a sequel, [miscellaneous ][petitions, ][if ][any, ][pending]

in the Writ Petition [shall ][stand ][closed']

SdI- P. PADMANABHADDYASSISTANTTRAR//TRUE COPY//SECTIONFICER

To,1 . The Principal Secretary, [Municipal ][Administrat'ron ][and ][Urban ][Development]Departmerit, Secretariat, [Hyderabad]1 . The Principal Secretary, [Municipal ][Administrat'ron ][and ][Urban ][Development]Departmerit, Secretariat, [Hyderabad]

2. The Commissioner, [Greater ][Hyderabad ][Municipal Corporation' ][Tank ][Bund]Road, HYderabadRoad, HYderabad

3. TheCommissioner,TheGreaterHyderabadMunicipalCorporation,Circle-ll,Uppal, HYderabadUppal, HYderabad

4. One CC to [SRI M. SRIKANTH' Advocate [OPUC]]

5. " Two cilrtt-r"'r. ccs ti6 [to ]State ot [GP ][for ][Municipal ]i.tanlana [Administration- ]at Hyderabad' [and ][oUTl[Urban Development, ][High]

6. One CC [to ][SRI ][P. ][SRINIVAS ][RAO, ][S'C' ][for ][Greater ][Hyderabad]lVlunicipal CorPoration [OPUC]lVlunicipal CorPoration [OPUC]

7. Two CD CoPies

KKSMP\

HIGH COURT

DATED:3111212024

ORDER

WP.No.36920 of 2024

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETTTIONWTHOUT COSTS

1t'lA .-{:o72 5 FrB 206Ct.5*t)Fs,^.T [CH][9O]

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead