Telangana High Court
CRP/853/2016 of K SULOCHANA, HYDERABAD Vs K RAJEEV REDDY, HYDERABAD on 31 December 2021
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DT. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA ctvtL REVISION PETITION NO:853 F 2016 Petition under Article 222 of the constitution of lndia aggrieved by the order dated
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DT. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
ctvtL REVISION PETITION NO:853
F 2016
Petition under Article 222 of the constitution of lndia aggrieved by the orderdated 25.09.2015 in IASR No.14109 of 2015 in os No.3 of 2015 on the fite of theCourt of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District Between:
K. Sulochana, W/o Late Yelta Reddy, Aged 62 years, Occupation: household Rl/oH 2-2-9013515, Amberpet, Hydera6ad.-H 2-2-9013515, Amberpet, Hydera6ad.-
...REVISION PETITIONER/DEFENDANT
AND
K. Rajeev Redd.y,- S/o K Krishna Reddy, Aged 57 years, Occupation: AdvocateR/o Flat no. 204, M J K Apartments Ba'rkafuura, iyderdOaa-Zi.R/o Flat no. 204, M J K Apartments Ba'rkafuura, iyderdOaa-Zi.
...RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF
CRPMP. NO: 1089 OF 2016
Petition under section ['l ]s1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to stay all proceedingsthe affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to stay all proceedingsincluding trial of os No.3 of 2015 on the file of principal senior civil Judge,Rangareddy District.Rangareddy District.
Counsel for the Petitioner: MS. SAMREEN SULTANA representing for SMT, RAMANI JONNA
Counsel for the Respondent: --
The Court made the following: ORDER
To,
THE HON'B,,E DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALA,THACIVIL ttrVIPETITION NO.853 OF 2016
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Ms. l;amreen Sultana, learned counsel representingMs. Ramani Jon ra, learned counsel for the [petitioner, ]submitsthat the Civil R:vision Petition has become infructuous and,therefore, it may t e dismissed.
In the light >f the said submission, the Civil Revision Petitionis dismissed as in ructuous.
There shal be no order as to costs. Miscellaneousapplications, if 2n [r, ]pending shall stand dismissed SD/.N.CHANDRA [SEKHAR ][RAO]ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
q_.
SECTION OFFICER
1. The Principal [Seni, ]'r [Civil ][Judge, Ranga Reddy District]
2. One CC to [Sri ][Ran ][ani Jonna, Advocate ][IOPUC]]
3. Two CD CoPies4. One Spare [CoPY]gbr
{
HIGH GOURT
DATED: 31l12fi'$21
ORDER
CRP.No.853 of 2016
DISMISSING TI. E CRPAS INFRUCTUC US
M
liiE [siA]o.,.,\),lco0 [7 ][FL! ][2.1?2]I).\il ,!