Telangana High Court
WP/22157/2005 of SMT. A. LAKSHMI NARASAMMA AND 2 OTHERS Vs THE COMMISSIONER FOR ENDOWMENTS AND 2 OTHERS on 30 December 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J,SREENIVAS RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 22157 OF 2005 Between: 1. Smt. A . Lakshmi Narasamma, Wo. Late Sri
[ [3303 ]]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENry TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J,SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 22157 OF 2005
Between:
1. Smt. A. Lakshmi Narasamma, Wo. Late Sri Anjaiah House wife, Fl/o. H.No.12-108, Gandhi Nagar, Yadagirigutta, Nalgonda District,508'l 15,12-108, Gandhi Nagar, Yadagirigutta, Nalgonda District,508'l 15,
2. Sri Gajwelli Balaiah, S/o. Late Sri Ramaiah Ex-Jamedar R/o. H.No.3-133,Near Pata Lakshmi Narasimhaswamy Temple, Peddireddigudem,Yadagirigutta, Nalgonda District, 508 1 15,Near Pata Lakshmi Narasimhaswamy Temple, Peddireddigudem,Yadagirigutta, Nalgonda District, 508 1 15,
3. Sri Chintapatla Ramachary, S/o. late Sri ranga Chary, Ex-TenkayalakottuSwamy, Rl/o. H.No. 8-21, Market Street, Yadagirigutta, Nalgonda District 5081.15Swamy, Rl/o. H.No. 8-21, Market Street, Yadagirigutta, Nalgonda District 5081.15
...PETITIONERS
AND
1. The Commissioner for Endowments, Boggulukunta, Hyderabad-S00 001
2. Sri Lakshmi Narasimha Swamy Devasthanam, Yadagirigutta, Rep. by itsExecutive Officer,Executive Officer,
3. The District Audit Officer, Audit Department, Nalgonda, Ramagiri, NalgondaDistrict,District, .,.RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia [praying ]that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue a writ order or direction, more particularly a writ of Mandamusdeclaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not sending the Service Registersto the 3rd Respondent, inspite of [permission ]accorded by the ['1st ]Respondent inD.Dis.No. A114570512004, dt. 12-10-2004 as arbitrary, illegal and violative ofPrinciples of Natural Justice and Articles 14,21 & 300-4 of the Constitutlon oflndia and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to send the Service Registersof the petitioners to the 3rd Respondent for taking appropriate action regardingfixation of their [pensionary ]benefits.
l.A. NO: ['l ]OF 2005(Wt'MP. NO: 28409 OF 2005)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased todirect the 2nd respondent to implement the instructions issued by the 1stRespondent on 12-10-2004 in D.Dis.No. A114570512004
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI S. ASHOK ANAND KUMAR
Counsel for the Resp,ondent No.1: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: JAGAN MOHAN REDDY KOTHA, SC FORSRI LAKSHMI NARASIMHA SWAMYD EVASTHANAM, YADAGIRIG UTTA, Counsel forthe Respondent No.3: GP FOR FINANCE & PLANNINGThe Court made the following: ORDER
.a v
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION No.22157 of 2OO5
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed seeking the following relief; " to issue a Wit, Order or direction, more particularlga Wit of Mandamus, decLaing the action of the 2"drespondent in not sending the Seruice Registers to tle3d respondent, inspite of permission accorded bg the1"t respondent in D.DIS No.A1/ 457O5/ 2004,dated12.10.2004 as arbitrary, illegal and uiolatiue ofpinciples of ruatural justice and Articles 14,21 and3O0A of the Constitution of India. and consequentlydirect the 2nd respondent to send the SeruiceRegisters of the Petitioners to the 3d Resporudent fortaking appropriate action regardirug fixation of theirPensionary benefits. "
2. The Executive Oflicer of the respondent No.2 filedthe counter stating that they submitted service registers tothe Audit Officer i.e., the respondent No.3 and therespondent No.3 in turn returned the service books alongwith the proceedings stating that they shall be paid as perthe pension scheme, as contemplated in G.O.Ms.No.839,dated 03.12.1999 of the Government of Andhra [Pradesh.]
3. In view of the same, the [grievance ]of [the petitioners]have already considered and [redressed ]by the [respondent]
No.2 temple. Therefore,no further orders need be passed in this Writ petition.
4With the above observation, the Writ petition isaccordingly closed. No costs.above observation, the Writ petition isaccordingly closed. No costs.
Consequently, miscellaneous
any, shall stand closed.
petition s pending, if
sD/-MOHD.SANAULLAHANSARI /ASSISTANFREGISTRAR//TRUECOPY/' a,r,--'-SECTION OFFICERASSISTANFREGISTRAR//TRUECOPY/' a,r,--'-SECTION OFFICER
To,1. One CC to SRI S. ASHOKANAND KUMAR, Advocate IOPUCI2. Two CCs to GP FOR FINANCE & PLANNING, High Court for the State ofTelangana. [OUT]
[OUT]3. OneCCto SRI JAGAN MOHAN REDDY KOTHA, SC FORSRI LAKSHMINARAS I MHA SWAMY DEVASTHANAM, YADAGIRI G UTTA, AdvocateloPUcl4. Two CCs to GP FOR ENDOWMENTS, High Court for the State of Telangana.IOUTI5. Two CD CopiesBNGJP
a5
HIGH COURT
DATED:3011212022
ORDERWP.No.22157 of 2005
CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION
Oo,e'"t
o[R][ THE ][S T4]/6-(o$(-))-3 1 JAil ?023I:_