Telangana High Court
WP/27653/2007 of Gunti Rajesh, Vs The Commissioner of Endowments, Dharmika Bhavan, on 28 December 2007
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTYEIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND SEVEN P R E S E N T THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA * * * WRIT PETITION No.27653 of 2007 Between: Gunti Rajesh … Petitioner Versus The
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENTYEIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND SEVEN
P R E S E N T
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA
* * *
WRIT PETITION No.27653 of 2007
Between:
Gunti Rajesh … Petitioner
Versus
The Commisioner of Endowments,Hyderabad & Ors. … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SRINIVASAMURTHYCHEEDELLA
Counsel for the Respondents: GOVT.PLEADER FORENDOWMENTSTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA* * *
WRIT PETITION No.27653 of 2007
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R :
The learned Asst.Govt.Pleader for Endowments had takennotice on 26-12-2007 get instructions.
2. The writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus, declaring theaction of the first respondent in issuing NotificationNo.11/22306/2006, dated 28-11-2007 calling applications for theproposed constitution of a Trust Board to Sri PrasannanjaneyaSwamy Temple, LB Nagar, Rangareddy district, during the pendencyof OA.No.175 of 2007 on the file of the second respondent, as illegal,arbitrary, unjust and opposed to the provisions of the EndowmentsAct 30/1987 and consequently to set aside the same and to passsuch other suitable orders as this Court may deems fit and proper inthe circumstances of the case.
3. Several facts had been narrated in the affidavit filed insupport of the writ petition.
4. It is stated that the petitioner filed an application before thesecond respondent, Deputy Commissioner of Endowments,Hyderabad for declaration as member of the founder family.
5. It is also brought to the notice of this Court that the subjectmatter is posted to 19-1-2008 for arguments.
6. In view of the same, let the second respondent positively dispose of the subject matter application on the said date withoutfurther adjourning the matter and let the first respondent furtherproceed with the matter relating to the Constitution of the TrustBoard thereafter.
7. The writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission.
No costs.
NARAYANA .
JUSTICE P . S .
28/12/2007.NB:
1) Operative Portion of the Order by wire at party’s costs.
2) Furnish CC of the order tomorrow.
B/o. ISL