Telangana High Court
WP/28085/2005 of Smt. N. Rani, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 30 December 2005
SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY W.P.No.28085 of 2005 Date:30.12.2005 Between: Smt.N.Rani -------PETITIONER AND The State of A.P. and others ---------RESPONDENTS ORDER: The petitioner is the Secretary and Correspondent of A.R. High School, Adinarayanapuram, Chirala, Prakasam District,
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY
W.P.No.28085 of 2005
Date:30.12.2005
Between:Smt.N.Rani
-------PETITIONER
AND
The State of A.P. and others
---------RESPONDENTS
ORDER:
The petitioner is the Secretary and Correspondent of A.R. High School,Adinarayanapuram, Chirala, Prakasam District, which is admitted to grant-in-aid.The petitioner appointed the sixth respondent herein as in-charge Head Master forthe school in the light of the proceedings, dated 14.08.2003, issued by the DeputyEducational Officer, declaring that the sixth respondent is senior to the fifthrespondent. The Regional Joint Director of School Education, Guntur, the thirdrespondent herein, passed the order dated, 05.09.2004, keeping the order, dated12.08.2004, passed by the petitioner in abeyance, until further orders. The grievanceof the petitioner is that though more than one year has elapsed, the third respondenthas not disposed of the matter and an uncertainty is prevailing in the institution.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader forSchool Education.
It is not known as to whether the third respondent passed orders, dated 05.09.2004,on his own accord or on a representation made by the fifth respondent. Be that as itmay, once he has kept the orders passed by the petitioner herein in abeyancepending further examination, he should have taken follow-up action, without further loss of time. He cannot have the luxury of stalling the proceedings and leaving thematter at that. Such a step would cripple the administration of the school.
Hence, the writ petition is disposed of directing the third respondent to passappropriate orders in the matter relating to the seniority between respondents 5 and6, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, dulyhearing the affected parties, and intimate the same to the petitioner. There shall beno order as to costs.
________________
30.12.2005
kdl
Page 1 of 1
Loading citations and judicial treatment…