Telangana High Court
WP/40033/2012 of B.Nagaraju, Vs The District Collector, on 28 December 2012
SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.40033 of 2012 Dated: 28.12.2012 Between: B.Nagaraju and another .. Petitioners. And The District Collector, Ananthapur District and others. .. Respondents. Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri S.D.Gowd Counsel for Respondents: Assistant
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.40033 of 2012
Dated: 28.12.2012
Between:
B.Nagaraju and another .. Petitioners.
And
The District Collector,Ananthapur Districtand others. .. Respondents.
Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri S.D.Gowd Counsel for Respondents: Assistant Government Pleader forRevenue The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to declare the action ofrespondent No.3 in insisting on production of ‘No ObjectionCertificate’ (NOC) from the revenue authorities as a pre-condition forentertaining the document for registration as illegal and arbitrary.
At the hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader forRevenue submitted that the Principal Secretary to the Governmentissued memo No.49938/Regn.I/A1/2012-4 dated 06.12.2012, wherebyhe has requested the Commissioner and Inspector General ofRegistration and Stamps, Andhra Pradesh to issue instructions to allthe registering officers not to ask for NOCs from the revenueauthorities before registration of prohibited properties and not to act onany such NOCs.
It is unfortunate that in spite of said proceedings, respondentNo.3 is stated to be insisting on production of NOC. Respondent No.3is, therefore, restrained from insisting on production of NOC as a pre-condition for entertaining the documents for registration. He shallreceive the document from the petitioners and process the same inaccordance with the provisions of the Registration Act, 1908.
The Writ Petition is allowed to the extent indicated above.
As a sequel, W.P.M.P.No.50821 of 2012 shall stand disposedof as infructuous.
28[th ]December, 2012
v v
________________________
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J