Telangana High Court

WP/28977/2019 of Mohd Ilyas Ahmed Vs The State of Telangana and 5 others on 31 December 2019

Cites 0, Cited by 0

SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.28977 of 2019 O R D E R: This writ petition is filed seeking to declare the action of respondent Nos.5 and 6 in sending the constables to the petitioner’s property/plot and threatening to vacate and surrender the possession of the

WRI T PETI TI ON No.28977 of 2019

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R:

This writ petition is filed seeking to declare the action of respondent Nos.5 and 6 in sending the constables to the petitioner’s property/plot and threatening to vacate and surrender the possession of the petitioner’s plot No.A 384 in Survey No.165 Part situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, and causing interference in the civil matters/disputes without any authority or jurisdiction, as being illegal and arbitrary.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home.

3. In similar matter, being W.P.No.28913 of 2019, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home obtained written instructions, and based on such instructions, he denied the allegation of the petitioner that respondents 5 and 6 sent constables to petitioner’s land and threatened him to vacate and surrender possession of the land. It is submitted that respondents 5 and 6 are only discharging their legitimate duties and did not harass, threaten or interfere in the civil disputes in any manner, nor did they interfere with the life and liberty of the petitioner by calling him to the police station, at any point of time. Recording the said submissions, by order, dated 30.12.2019, this Court closed the said writ petition.

4. Having regard to the above, since the petitioner herein is similarly situated, and in view of the fact that the land in respect of which the relief is being sought is also part of the layout in Gopanpally Village, the order, dated 30.12.2019, passed by this Court in W.P.No.28913 of 2019, will apply to this case, and therefore, no further orders need be passed in the present writ petition also.

5. The writ petition is accordingly closed. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand closed. No order as to costs. petitions, if any, shall also stand closed. No order as to costs.

_____________________

JUSTI CE T.VI NOD KUMAR Date:31.12.2019

GJ

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead