Telangana High Court

CRP/1664/2018 of Inderlal Agarwal Vs Dilsukhram Agarwal (DIED) per LRS on 31 December 2020

THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEt\/BER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1664 OF 20'18 Petitron under Arlicle 227 of the Constitution of lndia, aggrieved by the Order dated27l02l2018 passed in lA No.'123 of 2018 in OS No.619 of 2013 on

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD

THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEt\/BERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY

PRESENTTHE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G SRI DEVI

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1664 OF 20'18

Petitron under Arlicle 227 of the Constitution of lndia, aggrieved by the Orderdated27l02l2018 passed in lA No.'123 of 2018 in OS No.619 of 2013 on the file of theCourt of the lV Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Judge, Hyderabad.

Between:

Inderlal Agamal, S/o. Sagarmal, Aged about 6'1 years, Occ Business, R/o.H.No.16-2-705/39i58, Professo rs Colony, I\/a lakpet, Hyd era bad.

...PETITIONER/ DEFENDANT NO.3

AND

Dilsukhram Aganval (DIED) [per ]LRS, Hyderabad

1

.....Respondents/ Plaintiff

2. Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Represented by its Commissioner,Office at Tank Bund, Hyderabad.Office at Tank Bund, Hyderabad.

3. Greater Hyderabad IVunicipal Corporation, [Circle No.v, ][Rep. ][by ][its ][Deputy]Commissioner, Sardar [t/ahal, Charminar, Hydeqgbad.Commissioner, Sardar [t/ahal, Charminar, Hydeqgbad.

4. Ravi Sharoff, S/o. Not known, Age [[t/lajor, ]R/o. 3'' floor, [H.No.21-2-684 to ][693,]Veera Hanuman Complex, Charkaman, Hyderabad...Respondents/ DefendantsVeera Hanuman Complex, Charkaman, Hyderabad...Respondents/ Defendants

Page 1 of 3

5. Smt. Saraswathi Bal, W/o.Late Dilsukhram. Agarwal, [Aged about ][91 ][years, ][Occ-]Household, R/o. H.No.21-7-272,Milti Ka Sher, Charkaman, Hyderabad.Household, R/o. H.No.21-7-272,Milti Ka Sher, Charkaman, Hyderabad.6. Smt. Bina Bai, W/o. Late Gulab Chand [Agaruual, ]D/o. Lqte Dilsukhram [Aganrual,]Aged about 69 years, Occ- Household, R/o.3-2-870, 3'' [floor, Beside ][Lane]Ramakrishna Hospital, Nimboliadda, Kacheguda, [Hyderabad.]Aged about 69 years, Occ- Household, R/o.3-2-870, 3'' [floor, Beside ][Lane]Ramakrishna Hospital, Nimboliadda, Kacheguda, [Hyderabad.]

7. Sri. Shyam. Sundar Agaruval, S/o. Late Dilsukhram Agarwal, [Aged ][about ][66]years, Occ- Business, Rl/o. H. No.3-4-870/4, Near RTC Bus Depot, Barkatpura,Hyderabad.years, Occ- Business, Rl/o. H. No.3-4-870/4, Near RTC Bus Depot, Barkatpura,Hyderabad.B, Smt. Santosh, W/o.Ravinder Kumar [Agaruual, ]D/o. [Late Dilsukhram ][Agarwal,]Aged about 63 [years, ]Occ [-Household, ]R/o. Flat [No.403, ][Pruthvi Apartments,]Vivek Nagar, Chikkadpally, Hyderabad.Aged about 63 [years, ]Occ [-Household, ]R/o. Flat [No.403, ][Pruthvi Apartments,]Vivek Nagar, Chikkadpally, Hyderabad.

9. - Smt. Lakahmi Bai, W/o. Late Ashok [Kumar ][Agaruval, ][D/o. Late ][Dilsukhram]Agr*;t, Ageo aubut 61 years, occ- Househ5ld,Rlo.2l-1-491,2nd floor,Rikabgunj, Hyderabad.Agr*;t, Ageo aubut 61 years, occ- Househ5ld,Rlo.2l-1-491,2nd floor,Rikabgunj, Hyderabad.10. Sri. Jai Kiian'Agan,ual, S/o, Late Dilsukhram [Agarwal, Aged about ][60 ][years, ][Occ-]Business, R/o. H. No.5-8-5251111, Opp. Unity [House, Chiragh Ali ][Lane, ][Abids]Road, Hyderabad.Business, R/o. H. No.5-8-5251111, Opp. Unity [House, Chiragh Ali ][Lane, ][Abids]Road, Hyderabad.11, Sri. Mahbndra Kumar Agantal, S/o. Late [Dilsukhram Agarwal, Aged about ][58]years, Occ- Business, Rlo.21-7-272, tVittikasher. Charkaman, Hyderabad. [(The]particulars of Respondent No.S to 11 are Lrs of R'l ) years, Occ- Business, Rlo.21-7-272, tVittikasher. Charkaman, Hyderabad. [(The]particulars of Respondent No.S to 11 are Lrs of R'l )

...RES,ONDENTS

lA NO: 1 OF 2018

Page 2 of 3

Petition under Section 151 CPC [praying ][that ][in ][the circumstances stated ][in ][the]affidavit filed in support of the [petition, ]the [High ][Court ][may ][be pleased ][to ][grant ][stay]all further proceedings in OS.No. 619 of [2013 ][on the ][file ][of ][the ][lV Junior Civil ][Judge,]City Civil Court, Hyderabad [pending ]disposal [of ][the Civil ][Revision Petition]

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRl. SHARAD [SANGHI]Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 [to ][1'l ][: ][NONE ][APPEARED]The Court made the following: ORDER

To

ORDER:

Learned counsel lor tire petrtioner u,ould submtt that thecause in this rer.ision does not survir,e ltrther adjuLclic:rtion err-rd therer,isior-r has become infructuoirs.

In that vieu,of the matter, recording the said submission, theCivil Rcvision Petitior-r is disn-rissecl as inlrLtctlloLls. Tl.ierc shall bct-to orcler as l0 costs.

1. The lV Junior Civil Judge, [City Civil Judge, ][Hyderabad]2.One CC to Sri Sharad Sanghi, [Advocate (OPUC)]3.Two CD CopiesKj$--2.One CC to Sri Sharad Sanghi, [Advocate (OPUC)]3.Two CD CopiesKj$-- HIGH COURT

DATED:3111212020

ORDER

CRP.No.1664 [of ][2018]

DISMISSING THE [CRP ][AS WITHDRAWN.]

'('rlTAoo12 JAU [2021]:):,rii

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead