Telangana High Court
WP/34622/2011 of P.Simhachalam, Vs The A.P.Co-Operative Housing Societies Federation Ltd, on 29 December 2011
NOUSHAD ALI Writ Petition No.34622 of 2011 Date: 29-12-2011 Between P.Simhachalam … Petitioner and The A.P. Co-Op. Housing Societies Federation Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director, Hyderabad and 2 others … Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI Writ Petition No.34622
Writ Petition No.34622 of 2011
Date: 29-12-2011
Between
P.Simhachalam
… Petitioner
and
The A.P. Co-Op. HousingSocieties Federation Ltd.,Rep. by its Managing Director, Hyderabadand 2 others … Respondents
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI
Writ Petition No.34622 of 2011
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order:
Heard Sri Kowturu Vinaya Kumar, learned counsel for the petitionerand Sri Maturi Aravind, learned Standing Counsel, taking notice for therespondents 1 and 2.
2. The petitioner availed a housing loan of Rs.60,000/- fromSivaraopeta Cooperative Building Society Limited, Bhimavaram, WestGodavari district i.e. the 3[rd] respondent herein as sanctioned by the 1[st]respondent. He states that he repaid some instalments and even thoughsome amount is due, the Society has not furnished him the detailedaccount. He complains that without furnishing details, the respondents 2and 3 are insisting for repayment by taking coercive action. Therefore,the petitioner seeks a direction to the 3[rd] respondent to furnish the accounts before any action for recovery istaken.
3. In view of the short relief sought for, I am of the opinion that thewrit petition need not be kept pending, and is accordingly disposed of atthe stage of admission, directing the 3[rd] respondent-Society to furnish thestatement of account to the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible,preferably within a period of 3 (three) weeks from the date of receipt of acopy of this order.
4. In view of disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.43064 2011is dismissed as unnecessary. No costs.
___________________
NOUSHAD ALI, J.
29[th] December, 2011.Note:-Issue C.C. in one week.(B/o)Ak
29[th] December, 2011.(Ak)