Telangana High Court

WP/2782/1997 of D.SRINIVASULU JAMAMASJID NALGONDAANDANR Vs M.D.STATE BANK OF HYD AND4 OTHERS on 4 December 2001

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT APPEAL NO : 165 of 2002 & W.P. No. 2782 of 1997 WRIT APPEAL NO : 165 of

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD

FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARYTWO THOUSAND AND NINE

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARIand THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN

WRIT APPEAL NO : 165 of 2002 & W.P. No. 2782 of 1997

WRIT APPEAL NO : 165 of 2002

(Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated04/12/2001 in Rev. WPMP No. 10370 of 1999 in WP NO : 2782 OF 1997 onthe file of the High Court.)

Between:

1 The Managing Director State Bank of Hyderabad Head Office Gunfoundry Hyderabad 2 The General Manager Inspection and Finance Department State Bank of Hyderabad Gunfoundry Hyderabad 3 The Chief Manager Public Provident Fund & Gratuity Department State Bank of Hyderabad Gunfoundry Hyderabad 4 The Regional Manager, Region-I Region Office, State Bank of Hyderabad Prakash Nagar, Begumpet, Hyderabad Prakash Nagar, Begumpet, Hyderabad 5 The Branch Manager State Bank of Hyderabad, Nalgonda

..... APPELLANTS

AND

1 D.Srinivasulu

H.No.2-2-68 Ashok Nagar, Jamamasjid Nalgodna Dist 2 Miss D.Vanaja H.No.2-2-68 Ashok Nagar, Jamamasjid Nalgodna Dist

.....RESPONDENTS

Counsel for the Appellants:MR.ADDEPALLI SURYANARAYANA

Counsel for the Respondents: MR.M.MADHAVA REDDY

And

Writ Petition No. 2782 of 1997

Between:

Page 1 of 3

1 D.Srinivasulu

H.No.2-2-68 Ashok Nagar,

Jamamasjid Nalgodna Dist

2 Miss D.Vanaja

H.No.2-2-68 Ashok Nagar,

Jamamasjid Nalgodna Dist

..... PETITIONERS

AND

1 The Managing Director State Bank of Hyderabad Head Office Gunfoundry Hyderabad .

2 The General Manager Inspection and Finance Department State Bank of Hyderabad Gunfoundry Hyderabad . Hyderabad .

3 The Chief Manager Public Provident Fund & Gratuity Department State Bank of Hyderabad Gunfoundry Hyderabad . State Bank of Hyderabad Gunfoundry Hyderabad .

4 The Regional Manager, Region-I Region Office, State Bank of Hyderabad Prakash Nagar, Begumpet, Hyderabad. Prakash Nagar, Begumpet, Hyderabad.

5 The Branch Manager, State Bank of Hyderabad, Nalgonda.

.....RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will bepleased to issue an order or direction or writ more particularly in the nature ofMandamus declaring the proceedings No. PPG/PEN/525, dated 13.8.96issued by the Respondent No.1 as illegal, unconstitutional, null and void andconsequently direct the respondents to continue to pay the family pension tothe petitioners including the arrears of Family Pension w.e.f. 1.9.87 to tilltoday and pass such other order or orders as the Hon’ble Court may deem fitand proper in the interest of justice.

Counsel for the Petitioners:MR.M.MADHAVA REDDY

Counsel for the Respondents: MR.K.SRINIVASA MURTHY

Page 2 of 3

The Court made the following:

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARIandTHE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN

Writ Appeal No. 165 of 2002&WRIT PETITION No. 2782 of 1997

Judgment: (per Smt. T. Meena Kumari,J)

When the writ appeal has come up for hearing, learned counsel forboth the sides have filed a joint memo dated 27.2.2009, duly signed by both-the parties before this Court, whereby and whereunder the appellantbank-has paid a sum ofRs. 1,13,005/ to the respondents towards family pension.The respondents have also accepted the said amount towards full and finalsatisfaction of their claims and state that they do not have any further -grievance against the appellantbank.In the circumstances,learned counselfor both the parties have requested the Court dismiss the writ petition as wellas the writ appeal as withdrawn.

The joint memo is taken on record. While recording the submission ofthe learned counsel, the writ appeal and the writ petition are accordinglydismissed as withdrawn.No costs.

___________________

T. MEENA KUMARI,J

DATE: 27[th] February, 2009

pnb

__________________________

RAMESH RANGANATHAN,J

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead