Telangana High Court

WP/44496/2017 of RANA MANPOWER Vs THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT on 28 December 2017

Cites 0, Cited by 0

SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT WRIT PETITION No.44496 OF 2017 ORDER: Heard Mr. M.Vidyasagar, for the petitioner and Smt. Manjula, holding for Mr.Y.Ravindra, for the respondents. 2. In this Writ Petition, the challenge is to the order No.Ac/RO/GNT/48568/PD Cell/GNT/2017-18/5836, dated 15.11.2017,

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT WRIT PETITION No.44496 OF 2017

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Heard Mr. M.Vidyasagar, for the petitioner and Smt. Manjula, holding for Mr.Y.Ravindra, for the respondents.

2. In this Writ Petition, the challenge is to the order No.Ac/RO/GNT/48568/PD Cell/GNT/2017-18/5836, dated 15.11.2017, issued by the first respondent-Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-1, Regional Office, Guntur, under Section 14-B of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (for short, ‘the Act’) for penal damages directing the petitioner to pay an amount of Rs.3,11,662/- and subsequent order No.Ac/RO/GNT/48568/PD Cell/GNT/2017-18/5630, dated 30.11.2017, issued under 7Q of the Act directing the petitioner to pay an amount of Rs.2,56,917/-.

3. Smt. Manjula, appearing for the respondents, while opposing the maintainability of the writ petition, submits that against the orders impugned in the writ petition, the petitioner can avail the statutory remedy of appeal before the Industrial Tribunal.

4. I have perused the orders and taken note of objections raised by counsel appearing for the respondents. The Writ Petition is disposed of by this order:

(i) The petitioner is given liberty to file an appeal within four weeks from today.

(ii) The petitioner is directed to deposit 50% of the amount as demanded through the proceedings impugned in the writ petition, within two weeks from today.

(iii) On filing of appeal along with proof of payment, the Tribunal shall consider and dispose of the appeal, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of filing of the appeal.

(iv) Since the condition of deposit of 50% of the demanded amount is imposed on the petitioner, order No.Ac/RO/GNT/48568/PD Cell/GNT/2017-18/5836, dated 15.11.2017 and subsequent order No.Ac/RO/GNT/48568/PD Cell/GNT/2017-18/5630, dated 30.11.2017, are stayed pending appeal before the Industrial Tribunal.

______________________ JUSTICE S.V. BHATT

DECEMBER 28, 2017 YVL

YVL

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT

WRIT PETITION No.44496 OF 2017

Dt: 28.12.2017

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead