Telangana High Court
WP/6224/1999 of P. Navaneeswara Reddy, Vs The Dist. Educational Officer, on 27 December 2004
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 6224 of 1999 Between: P. Navaneeswara Reddy, S/o. Sambasiva Reddy, 15 years,Student,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI
WRIT PETITION NO : 6224 of 1999
Between:
P. Navaneeswara Reddy, S/o. Sambasiva Reddy, 15
years,Student, R/o. Cuddapah, Cuddapah District being minor Rep by his father and natural guardian P.Sambasiva Rep by his father and natural guardian P.Sambasiva Reddy, S/O. Pedda Pulla Reddy, R/o Cuddapah,Cuddapah District.
AND
..... PETITIONER
1 The Dist. Educational Officer, Cuddapah, Cuddapah District. Cuddapah, Cuddapah District.
2 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Cuddapah, Cuddapah District. Cuddapah, Cuddapah District.
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased toissue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamusdeclaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in orally directing the petitioner not toappear for the examination from 25-3-1999 onwards relating to Second SchoolCertificate examination in Municipal Urdu Girls High School, Centre, Kadapa asillegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and consequently direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to take the examination in the said center relating to SecondarySchool Certificate examination.
Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.P.SRIDHAR REDDY
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION
The Court made the following :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner Mr P.Sridhar Reddy thatthe cause in the writ petition does not survive and therefore no further adjudication isnecessary in the writ petition.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
___________
rkk
To
1 The Dist. Educational Officer,
Cuddapah, Cuddapah District.
2 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Cuddapah, Cuddapah District. Cuddapah, Cuddapah District.
3 Two CCs to GP for School Education, High Court buildings, Hyderabad (OUT)
4. Two CD copies.