Telangana High Court
WP/44779/2017 of b.yadagiri Vs the state of telegana on 29 December 2017
SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT WRIT PETITION No.44779 of 2017 ORDER: Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Government Pleader (Home) for respondents. The petitioner prays for the following relief :- “…..to issue an order or orders more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Relief
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT
WRIT PETITION No.44779 of 2017
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Government Pleader (Home) for respondents.
The petitioner prays for the following relief :- “ …..to issue an order or orders more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4[th] respondent herein in not taking appropriate action pursuant to the crime in FIR No.1106 of 2017 dated 05-12-2017 on the file of Jeedimetla Police Station, Hyderabad, T.S. as biased, arbitrary…..” .
Learned Assistant Government Pleader (Home), on instructions, submits that after completion of investigation in Cr.No.1106 of 2017, the 4[th] respondent has filed charge-sheet before VI Metropolitan Magistrate, Medchal.
In view of filing of charge-sheet, learned counsel for petitioner does not press the writ prayer.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as not pressed. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.
Dt: 29-12-2017 Prv
_____________
S. V. BHATT, J