Telangana High Court
CRP/2573/2011 of Menda Latchayya Vs Menda Simhachalam on 30 December 2016
Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO C.R.P. No.2573 OF 2011 ORDER: Despite the matter being posted today under the caption ‘For Dismissal’, there is no representation for the revision petitioner. However, in view of the orders passed by this Court in C.R.P. Nos.3431 of 2016 and 4737 of
HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO
C.R.P. No.2573 OF 2011
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Despite the matter being posted today under the caption ‘For Dismissal’, there is no representation for the revision petitioner. However, in view of the orders passed by this Court in C.R.P. Nos.3431 of 2016 and 4737 of 2016 of even date, from the settled legal position, he is entitled to police aid and at liberty either to file an application for violation of injunction order in execution under Order XXI Rule 32 C.P.C or under Order XXXIX Rule 2A C.P.C by virtue of this order.
2) Accordingly, the revision is closed. No order as to costs.
3) Consequently, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending in this Revision, shall stand closed.
_______________________________ Dr. B. SIVA SANKARA RAO, J Dt.30.12.2016 knl