Telangana High Court
WP/28076/2008 of Ch. Venkateswarlu Vs The Government of India on 24 December 2008
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 28076 of 2008 Between: Ch. Venkateswarlu S/o. Chauta Daveedu (Under Suspension) R/o.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT
PRESENTTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANAWRIT PETITION NO : 28076 of 2008
Between:
Ch. Venkateswarlu S/o. Chauta Daveedu (Under Suspension) R/o. H.No.50-B, Type-I,Group Centre, CRPF Camp, Hakimpet Post, Secunderabad - 500 087(AP).
..... PETITIONER
AND
1 The Government of India Rep. by its Secretary Ministry of Home Affairs, South Block, New Delhi - 110 001.
2 The Director General of Police Central Reserve Police Force CGO Complex, Lodi Road, New Delhi - 110 003. CGO Complex, Lodi Road, New Delhi - 110 003.
3 The Inspector General of Police Southern Sector CRPF., Jubilee Hills, CRPF., Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - (A.P.)
4 The DIGP. Group Centre, CRPF. Ranga Reddy, Hakimpet Post, Secunderabad - 500 087 (A.P.) Ranga Reddy, Hakimpet Post, Secunderabad - 500 087 (A.P.)
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying thatin the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Courtwill be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly onein the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the 4th respondentimpugned proceedings dated 7-11-2008 rejecting my appeal for changeof enquiry officer as arbitrary, unjust and illegal and consequently setaside the same.
Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.NARINDER PAL SINGH
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: MR.A.RAJASHEKARREDDY (ASST SOLICITOR GEN)
Counsel for the Respondent No.4: Sri Nimmagadda Satyanarayana The Court made the following ORDER:
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANAWrit Petition No.28076 of 2008
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order:
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of theCourt to withdraw the writ petition. Accordingly, permission is grantedand the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
___________________
N.V. RAMANA, J.
Date: 24.12.2008VGB