Telangana High Court
CRLP/1936/2009 of Dodda Rami Reddy, Vs Dodda Narayana Reddy, on 30 December 2010
COURT OF JUDICATURE ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY THE THIRTYETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL PETITION No. 1936 OF 2009. Between: Dodda Rami Reddy … Petitioner V/s. Dodda Narayana Reddy & Anr. … Respondents
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ANDHRA PRADESHAT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY THE THIRTYETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TEN
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGOCRIMINAL PETITION No.1936 OF 2009.Between:Dodda Rami Reddy … PetitionerV/s.Dodda Narayana Reddy & Anr. … RespondentsCounsel for the Petitioner : Sri K. Rathangapani ReddyCounsel for the Respondents: Addl. Public Prosecutor The Court made the following order : (order follows 2[nd] page)
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.1936 OF 2009
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R:
This Criminal Petition is filed under section 482 Cr.P.C.seeking to call for the records in Crl.MP.No. 31 of 2009 in Crl.A.No.93 of 2007 on the file of the Court of I-Additional Sessions Judge,Khammam and quash the same and to pass such other suitableorders as this Court may deems fit and proper in the circumstances ofthe case.
2. When the matter came up today, the learned counsel for thepetitioners called absent and there is no representation on his behalf.The prayer in this petition is that the appellate court refused to acceptthe written arguments filed by the petitioner in Crl.A.No. 93 of 2007 onthe file of the Court of I-Additional Sessions Judge, Khammam.
3. On the other hand, the learned counsel representing therespondent no.1 submitted that while pendency of this matter beforethis court, the appellate court already received the same. Hence,nothing survives in this matter.
3. Recording the submissions made by the learned counselfor the respondent No.1, this Criminal Petition is dismissed asinfructuous.
______________________
JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO
30-12-2010I s L
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO
CRIMINAL PETITION No. 1936 OF 2009
Circulation No. 54Date:30-12-2010Court Master: IsLComputer No.43