Telangana High Court

PIL/518/2013 of The Matrix Laboratories AND Astrix Laboratories Contract Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh on 30 December 2013

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.518 OF 2013 DATED:30.12.2013 Between: The Matrix Laboratories &

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

PRESENT

THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.518 OF 2013

DATED:30.12.2013

Between:

The Matrix Laboratories & Astrix Laboratories Contract Workers Union,Affiliated to A.I.T.U.C., Regd. No.4509Gadda PatharamKazipallyJinnaram (M), Medak DistrictRep. by its District President R. Eashwar PrasadR/o.No.22560, Type-II Qrs., Ordinance Factory MedakYeddumailaramMedak District (AP) … Petitioner

And

The Government of Andhra PradeshRep. by its Principal SecretaryLabour DepartmentSecretariatHyderabadand others … Respondents THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA ANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.518 OF 2013

ORDER:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)

This matter does not require any hearing on filing of counteraffidavit. The petitioner is an office bearer of a union of a large numberof casual workers. A representation has been made to respondentNo.2 - Commissioner of Labour for redressal of grievance, amongstothers, of non-regularization and absorption of casual workers.

Learned counsel for the State submits that steps have alreadybeen taken pursuant to the representation by issuing notice. However,no final decision has yet been taken.

Since we are disposing of this matter at this stage without callingfor affidavits, we pass the following order.

We direct the respondent - Commissioner of Labour to come to alogical conclusion on the issue, after giving opportunity of hearing tothe concerned, if action has already been taken, within a period of twomonths from the date of communication of this order. If no action hasbeen taken, then the Commissioner shall take action in accordancewith law on the representation made by the petitioner and thendecision shall be taken in accordance with law. In that case, the entireexercise shall be completed within a period of three months from thedate of communication of this order.

With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Therewill be no order as to costs.

Consequently, P.I.L.M.P. No.796 of 2013 filed by the petitioner toexpedite the hearing of the writ petition, shall stand closed.

________________________

K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ

_______________________

SANJAY KUMAR, J 30.12.2013

bnr

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead