Telangana High Court
WP/42322/2015 of K. Rama Sekhar, S/o. Late Madhava Swamy, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 31 December 2015
SRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.42322 OF 2015 ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Land Acquisition. The petitioner claims that the respondents are likely to dispossess him and demolish his house to an extent of 107 sq.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR
WRIT PETITION No.42322 OF 2015
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learnedGovernment Pleader for Land Acquisition.
The petitioner claims that the respondents are likely to dispossess him and demolish his house to an extent of 107 sq.yards in Plot No.884-A of Vadlapudi R.H. Colony, Sector-II,Visakhapatnam. It is, however, accepted in the affidavit that the petitioner had given a show cause notice in Rc.No.18/2013/R1,dated 03.10.2015, by the Special Grade Deputy Collector (L.A.), SteelPlant, Visakhapatnam, the 2[nd] respondent, for which he has already given a detailed explanation,dated 03.11.2015. The petitioner alleges that as no orders are passedand no enquiry is held so far, there is an attempt to dispossess himand demolish his house.
Learned Government Pleader for Land Acquisition, who hasreceived instructions from the 2[nd] respondent, submits that thepetitioner was given notice and his explanation, dated 03.11.2015,was received by Speed Post and the file is under process. However,the instructions deny that the petitioner is neither displaced person normarried major son is displaced as on the cut-off date and the eligibilityof the petitioner is yet to be adjudicated and decided.
In view of the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the2[nd] respondent to consider the explanation, dated 03.11.2015,submitted by the petitioner, with reference to the show cause notice issued to him, and take appropriate decision in the matter inaccordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petitionshall stand closed.
____________________________
VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR, J31.12.2015Note:- Issue C.C. in one week. (B/o) KH