Telangana High Court
WP/46568/2022 of Mamilla Shalandhar Yadav Vs The State of Telangana on 30 December 2022
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER .-- TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRNSENT [3168 l ...PETITIONER Revenue Deparlmcni ANI) 4 Mamilla .Shalandhar Yadav, S/o iVl.Kumar yadav, Occ. agriclutre, R/o H.No.l_l l_i04,Near Budvel
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER .--TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWOPRNSENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LTTKSHMANWRIT PETITION NO: 46568 O[ 2022
Between:
zl
Mamilla .Shalandhar Yadav, S/o iVl.Kumar yadav, Occ. agriclutre, R/o H.No.l_l l_i04,Near Budvel Railway, Rajendra Nagar , nanga neaay airt.ict.
...PETITIONER
ANI)
i. The State ,oi. T"lurgrrrr, Rep by its principal ije.jretaryRevenueDeparlmcniSecretariat H;,derabad.Secretariat H;,derabad.
2. The District Collector. Ranga ReCdv Disrrict.
3. The Thasildhar, Nadigama Mandal, Ranga Reddy Dislrict.
4Survyor. Mandal Rerenue oflice l.{e..r:drgarna lv{andal, Rang Reddy5?r",.,1f-0, 5?r",.,1f-0,
...RESPONDENTS ,/'-
Petition urrder Article 226 of trrc constitution of India praying that i, thecircumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the.l-iigh couri ,,oyi" pt.ur"d toissue an appropriate writ order or direction mo.e particuiarly one in the nature of writ ofMandamus declaring the action of Nos. 3 and 4 in noi .r.u"y i, .".p""t orland admeasuring sy. No.r75 an_ extent of acco.20 guntas, "cnducting sy.No.i76 Ac.o.26 gultas ir.,survey No.177 extent of acc.r-17.gtntas totar extint ,at.tlc.2- 23 guntas.riuoi"J inMamidipaily viltage Nadigama \aan{al, Ranga Reddy Disrrict pursuanf i";;;;ili;;"..application No TTDER 0222oog3g4go datei 02 -o{- zozz made under the format of FLine as illegal arbitrary and vioration of Articre 300A of constitution of India anaconsequently direct the Respondent Nos. 3 ancl 4 to complete the survey ro. tt said land pursrnnt to petitioners application dt 02_ Og _2022"-rbor"
Counsel for the Peritioner(s):SRl. G RAJESIITAR RAC
Counsel for thc Rcspondents: AGp FOR REVENUE
The Court made the follorving: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICHE K. LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION No.46568 of 2o22
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Heard Sri G. Rajeshwar Rao, learned counselappearing for the petitioner and learned AssistantGovernment Pleader for Revenue appearing forrespondents. Per-used the record.
Petitioner is claiming that he is the absolute ownerand possessor of lands admeasuring Ac.0-20O0 gts., inSy.No.175, Ac.0-2600 gts1nSy.No.176 andAc.1-17O0 Bts.,1nSy.No.177, total admeasuringAc.2-23OO situated at gts., Mamidipally village,Nandigama Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. In proof of thesame, he has filed copies of latest pattedar passbook. Hehas submitted F-line application bearingNo.DERO222OO839480 dated O2-O8-2O22 withrespondent Nos.3 and 4 with a request to conduct surveyand demarcate the aforesaid lands by fixing tloundaries.
Despite receiving and acknowledging the said [F-line]application, respondent Nos.3 and [4 did ][not act upon ][the]same, therefore, the present writ [petition.]
Whereas learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, on instructions, would submit [that ][respondent]Nos.3 and 4 will consider the aforesaid F-line applicationsubmitted by the petitioner by following due [procedure]laid down under law and conduct survey and demarcatethe aforesaid lands by fixing boundaries.
In view of the aforesaid discussion, this writ [petition]
1S disposed of, directing respondent Nos.3 and 4 toconsider the F-line application bearingNo.DER02220O839480 dated 02-08-2022 submitted bythe petitioner, conduct survey and demarcate theaforesaid lands by fixing boundaries, strictly1nabcordance with law by putting the [petitioner ]and allaffected parties on notice and affording them anopportunity of hearing. If respondent Nos.3 and 4 are not inclined to accept the claim / request [of ][the ][petitioner,]they shall assign specific reasons, [pass a ][reasoned order]and shall communicate copy of the [said order ][to ][the]petitioner. They shall complete the entire exercise'withina period of forty five [(45) ]days [from the ][date ][of ][receipt ][of ][a]copy of this order. There [shall ][be ][no ][order ][as ][to ][costs.]Asa sequel, the miscellaneous [petitions, ][if ][any,]pending in the Writ Petition shall stand [closed']
Conclusion
SD/- MOHD. SANAULLAH ANSARIASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPYII
SECTION OFFICER
HIGH COURT
KLJ
DATED:30112/2022
ORDERWP.No.46568 ot 2022
WP IS DISPOSED WITH NO COSTS
1P.i: [S ][T{]15:r!.oO17 JAl-l ?ilN,'-,|'