Telangana High Court
WP/28867/2019 of Md. Yusufuddin, Vs State of Telangana on 30 December 2019
SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.28867 OF 2019 DATED : 30.12.2019 Between : Md. Yusufuddin S/o.Md. Zainuddin, Aged about 49 yrs, Occu : Business, R/o.H.No.10-3-31, Sripuram Colony, Lavanya Nilayam, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District, Telangana State. ..... Petitioner And State of
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No.28867 OF 2019
DATED : 30.12.2019
Between :
Md. Yusufuddin S/o.Md. Zainuddin, Aged about 49 yrs, Occu : Business, R/o.H.No.10-3-31, Sripuram Colony, Lavanya Nilayam, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District, Telangana State.
..... Petitioner
And
State of Telangana,
rep. by its Principal Secretary,
Revenue Department,
Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad & others.
…..Respondents
The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION NO.28867 OF 2019
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER :
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue for respondents 1 to 5.
2. The Joint Collector, by his order, dated 25.03.2019, in the revision preferred by the 6[th] respondent allowed the revision setting aside the order of Revenue Divisional Officer and the Tahsildar, granting mutation in favour of petitioner. He has also cancelled the pattadar pass book issued in favour of petitioner. Aggrieved thereby petitioner filed W.P.No.9597 of 2019 and the same is pending consideration of this Court. No stay of the order impugned therein, was granted. While so, petitioner made a representation on 17.12.2019 addressed to the District Collector, Karimnagar, seeking direction to the Tahsildar, not to mutate the name of 5[th] respondent, in accordance with the order of the Joint Collector, by stating that W.P.No.9597 of 2019 is pending in this Court and till a decision is made by this Court, mutation proceedings shall not be undertaken.
3. As noticed above, there is no stay granted by this Court and as on today, the order of the Joint Collector stands. Furthermore, in an independent writ petition, petitioner cannot seek direction not to undertake mutation exercise, based on the order passed by the Joint Collector, when petitioner challenges the said order, in another writ petition and the same is pending consideration of this Court. Therefore, this writ petition is not maintainable.
4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed leaving it open to the petitioner to work out his remedies in the pending writ petition. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
30[th] December, 2019 Rds
__________________
P.NAVEEN RAO,J