Telangana High Court
WP/27727/2005 of M/s New Anupama Restaurant and Bar Vs The Commissioner of Police, on 28 December 2005
SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION NO.27727 OF 2005 DATED:28.12.2005 Between: M/s.New Anupama Restaurant & Bar H.No.10-2-289/4, A.C.Guards, Hyderabad Rep. by its Licensee Mr.Achanta Nageshwar Rao S/o.Sambasiva Rao …Petitioner And The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad City,
WRIT PETITION NO.27727 OF 2005
DATED:28.12.2005
Between:
M/s.New Anupama Restaurant & Bar
H.No.10-2-289/4, A.C.Guards, Hyderabad
Rep. by its Licensee Mr.Achanta Nageshwar Rao S/o.Sambasiva Rao …Petitioner
And
The Commissioner of Police,
Hyderabad City, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad
and others
…Respondents
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
WRIT PETITION NO.27727 OF 2005
The petitioner is a firm which obtained a licence from excise authorities in form – 2Bto run a bar and restaurant in the name and style of M/s.New Anupama Restaurant &Bar. Alleging that the first respondent is insisting upon the petitioner to obtain alicence under Section 3(h) of the Hyderabad City Police Act, 1348 fasli, thepetitioner filed the present Writ Petition seeking a direction to the respondents not tointerfere with the business of the petitioner including the entertainment provided byhim by engaging a live band/orchestra during working hours of the restaurant.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader forHome. During their submissions, it is brought to the notice of this Court an order passed by a Division Bench of this Court in W.A.Nos.2572 and 2573 of 2005,dt.23.12.2005 directing the Commissioner of Police to consider the representation ofthe appellants/petitioners within a period of two weeks and also further directing notto interfere with the activities of the appellants/petitioners therein.
Therefore, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to approach the first respondent forappropriate orders in terms of the judgment of the Division Bench referred tohereinabove. As and when such representation is made, the first respondent shallconsider the same and pass appropriate orders within a period of two weeks fromtoday. If the petitioner is engaging live-band and orchestra, there shall be nointerference. However, this order does not enable the petitioner bar to arrange anytype of dances at the bar and restaurant.
The Writ Petition with the above observations is accordingly disposed of.
_______________
28.12.2005 (V.V.S.RAO, J)
Note:Issue CC today.
(B.O)bnr