Telangana High Court
WP/41676/2017 of Lingala Sunila, Vs The State of Telangana, on 29 December 2017
SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO WP.No.41676 of 2017 ORDER: Heard counsel for petitioner and the Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondents. 2. Petitioner’s grievance is that 3rd respondent is not disposing of the petitioner’s application filed under Section 9A of
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO WP.No.41676 of 2017
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Heard counsel for petitioner and the Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondents.
2. Petitioner’s grievance is that 3[rd] respondent is not disposing of the petitioner’s application filed under Section 9A of the A.P. Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973 (for short ‘the Act’) which had been made to him on 12.09.2017.
3. Since such applications are maintainable in view of the said provision introduced by amending the Act by Act 17 of 2012 introduced on 12.05.2012 with retrospective effect, which legal position is not disputed by the Government Pleader for Revenue, the 3[rd] respondent is directed to decide the petitioner’s application within a period of four (04) months from today, in accordance with law, after giving notice to all affected parties.
Since such applications are maintainable in view of the said provision introduced by amending the Act by
4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.
5. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.
29[th] December, 2017.
______________________________
M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO, J