Telangana High Court
WP/26858/2006 of G. Tirumala Naidu Vs The District Collector, Kurnool, on 27 December 2006
SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.26858 of 2006 Dated:27.12.2006 Between G.Tirumala Naidu …..Petitioner and 1. The District Collector, Kurnool Kurnool District and others. …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.26858 of 2006 ORDER: This writ petition is
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU
W.P.No.26858 of 2006
Dated:27.12.2006
BetweenG.Tirumala Naidu
and
…..Petitioner
1.The District Collector, KurnoolKurnool District and others.
…Respondents
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULUW.P.No.26858 of 2006
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed seeking a Mandamus to declare the action of the 2[nd] respondent in notpassing the orders in appeal filed by the petitioneragainst the orders of the 3[rd] respondent videproceedings in Rc.No.E.824/2004 dated 20.5.2006as arbitrary and illegal.
It appears that the petitioner was a fair price shop dealer of Pinnapuram Village, PanyamMandal, Kurnool District. While so, hisauthorization was cancelled vide proceedings dated20.5.2006 the 3[rd]by respondent-RevenueDivisional Officer, Nandyal. Aggrieved by the same,the petitioner carried the matter in appeal before the2[nd] respondent-Joint Collector and the same is pending. According to the petitioner, though theappeal was filed as early as on 20.6.2006, the sameis not yet disposed of and the non-disposal ofappeal causes prejudice to his interest.
In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on merits, the 2[nd]respondent-JointCollector is directed to dispose of the appealpurported to have been filed by the petitioner on20.6.2006 aggrieved by the orders passed by the3[rd]respondent videhis proceedings inRc.No.824/2004 dated 20.5.2006, within a period oftwo months from the date of receipt of a copy of thisorder.
Writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Nocosts.
rkk
_________
27-12-2006