Telangana High Court
WP/21821/1997 of M.Nageswara Rao Vs Deputy Transport Commissioner AND Secretary,Regional on 31 December 2004
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION NO : 21821 of 1997 Between: M.Nageswara Rao S/o Sambasiva Rao R/o D.No.66-6-7, Ashoknagar,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA
WRIT PETITION NO : 21821 of 1997
Between:
M.Nageswara Rao S/o Sambasiva Rao R/o D.No.66-6-7, Ashoknagar, Kakinada, East Godavari District.
AND
..... PETITIONER
1 Deputy Transport Commissioner & Secretary,Regional Transport Authority,East Godavari District,at Kakinada.
2 Transport Commissioner,Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. Hyderabad.
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased toissue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaringthe action of the respondent No.1 in not receiving the application of the petitioner forregistration of his Vehicle bearing Chasis No.KHW-378960 and EngineNo.6,EDHW-17 as a Motor Cab as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law and further directthe 1st Respondent to register the said vehicle as a Motor Cab by assigningRegistration Mark, forthwith; Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.E.MARUTHI RAJA
Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR TRANSPORT
The Court made the following :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER :
It is represented that the questions involved in this Writ Petition are covered by adecision of a Division Bench of our High Court in a case of O. Gangadhar Vs.Transport Commissioner, in W.P.No. 20335 of 1999 and Batch.
In view of the same, the Writ Petition is hereby dismissed as being covered by theaforesaid decision. No order as to costs.
-----------------------------
P.S. Narayana, J.
31[st] December, 2004.KM
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
// TRUE COPY //
SECTION OFFICER
To
1 The Deputy Transport Commissioner & Secretary,Regional Transport Authority,East Godavari District,at Kakinada. 2 The Transport Commissioner,Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. Transport Authority,East Godavari District,at Kakinada. 2 The Transport Commissioner,Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.
3. 2CCs to G.P. for Transport, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT)
4. 2CD copies
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA
W.P.No. 21821 OF 1997