Telangana High Court
WP/783/2007 of K.Venkata Ramana, Vs the Government of A.P., represented by the Secretary, on 31 December 2008
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 783 of 2007 Between: 1 K.Venkata Ramana, s/o K.Ankisetty, D.No.35-39,69/1,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINIWRIT PETITION NO : 783 of 2007
Between:1 K.Venkata Ramana, s/o K.Ankisetty, D.No.35-39,69/1, Dayanandnagar, Kancharlapalem, Visakhapatnam-530 008.2 Burri Rajamani, w/o Satyanarayana, c/o B.Ramprabhakar, Flat No.203, Sri Ram Enchave, APSEB Colony,Butchirajpalem, Visakhapatnam=26.3 Tirumala Reddy Savitri, w/o TAS Narayana, r/o F-6, Srinivasa Towers, Behind Vimal Showroom, Gajuwaka,Visakhapatnam-26.4 Nandigam Ramesh Babu, s/o Narayana Rao, c/o N.Gangadhara Rao, MIG-A-1, Sheelanagar, Visakhapatnam-530012.5 Pemmada Kanakaratnam, w/o P.Kameswara Rao, r/o MIG-B-81, Sheelanagar, BHPV Post, Visakhapatnam-12.6 Mukkamala Venkata Durga Swarjya Laxmi, w/o M.V.Ramarao, r/o D.No.49-23-1, Lalitanagar, Visakhapatnam-16.
7 Buddaraju Suryanarayana, s/o Suryanarayana Raju, c/o Ch.Venkataraju, D.No.32-4-13, Natayyapalem, Visakhapatnam- 12.8 Koshy Abraham, s/o M.Koshy, c/o J.Shanmukha Rao, D.No.14-12-11, Bhanoji thota, B.C.Road, NewGajuwaka, Visakhapatnam-26.9 Nadimenti Yashoda, w/o NSL Sanyasi Rao, r/o HIG-26, Sheelanagar, Visakhapatnam-12. 10 Nakka Venkayamma, w/o Appanna, r/o Plot No.1, Prasad Nagar Layout, Bhanoji Thota, Gajuwaka,Visakhapatnam District.11 Kancharla Nagayya, s/o K.Venkatayya, r/o Plot No.117, A.S.R.Nagar, Seethammadhara, Visakhapatnam-13.12 Gummadla Madhuri, d/o V.Veeranjaneyulu, c/o K.Nagaiah, r/o Plot No.117, A.S.R.Nagar, Seethammadhara,Visakhapatnam-13.13 Meharunnisa Begum, s/o Shaik Sathar, c/o J.Ramnaidu, r/o D.No.12-26-6, Seetaramnagar, Gajuwaka,Visakhapatnam-26.14 Kanti Mahanthi Uma Kumari, w/o Seethapathi, r/o D.No.1-3-7, Akkireddipalem, BHPV (O), Visakhapatnam-530 012.
..... PETITIONER(S)
AND
1 The Government of A.P., represented by the Secretary, RevenueDepartment, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.
Page 1 of 3
2 The District Collector, Visakhapatnam District, Visakhapatnam,Andhra Pradesh.3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Visakhapatnam District,Visakhapatnam.
4 The Special Deputy Tahsildar (Inams) Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam(division), Visakhapatnam, A.P., 5 the Mandal Revenue Officer, Visakhapatnam District, Visakhapatnam(A.P.,)
6 The Mandal Revenue Inspector, Visakhapatnam District,Visakhapatnam. A.P.,
.....RESPONDENT(S)
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that inthe circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will bepleased to issue a writ, order or direction, particularly a writ in the natureof mandamus, calling for the records relating to the properties to thepetitioners and to declare that the petitioners are lawful owners andpossessors of the lands in survey No.86 of Gajuwaka Mandal,Visakhapatnam by virtue of pattas granted to A.V.Bhanoji Rao by theauthorities and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court maydeem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
Counsel for the Petitioners : MR. K.V.SUBRAHMANYA NARUSU
Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following :
THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINIWRIT PETITION NO.783 OF 2007
ORDER :
This Writ Petition is filed seeking declaration that the petitionersherein are lawful owners and possessors of the land in Sy.No.86 ofGajuwaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam by virtue of pattas said to have beengranted in favour of their vendor.
When the matter is taken up for consideration, it is brought to mynotice by the learned counsel for the petitioner that W.P.No.26098 of 2000and etc. which were filed with an identical prayer were disposed of by thisCourt by a common order dated 22.09.2008 with directions as under:
Page 2 of 3
Conclusion
“In view of this submission of the learnedcounsel for the petitioners, the writ petitions aredisposed of with liberty to the petitioners toapproach the Officer concerned within a periodof eight (8) weeks from today for regularization oftheir occupation in terms of G.O.Ms.No.44. If suchapplications are received, the competent authorityshall dispose of the same expeditiously. Tilldisposal of the petitioners’ application, if madewithin the above-stipulated time, their possessionshall not be interfered with.”
Since, the petitioners herein are also similarly situated, following thecommon order in W.P.No.26098 of 2000 and etc., dated 22.09.2008, thisWrit Petition is disposed of in terms of the above order.
_____________G. ROHINI, J.
Dt. 31.12.2008 Khm/gbs
Page 3 of 3
Loading citations and judicial treatment…