Telangana High Court
WP/28607/2008 of Rayudu Ganesh, Vs The Deputy Commissioner of Endowments, on 30 December 2008
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No. 28607 of 2008 Between: Rayudu Ganesh, S/o. R.Venkateswar Rao, R/o. Rajahmundry, East
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHANWRIT PETITION No. 28607 of 2008
Between:
Rayudu Ganesh, S/o. R.Venkateswar Rao, R/o. Rajahmundry, East Godavari District.
AND
.....
PETITIONER
1 The Deputy Commissioner of Endowments, Kakinada, EastGodavari District.Godavari District.
2 The Asst.Commissioenr of Endowments, Rajahmundry, E.G.District.
3 The Executive Officer, Sri. Gowthami Jeevakarunya Sangam, Rajamundry, E.G. District. Rajamundry, E.G. District.
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the HighCourt will be pleased to to issue order direction more particularly onein the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare the orders of the 1strespondent passed in O.A.No.123 of 2007, 124 of 2007 and 125 of2007 dated 30.09.2008 having no power and jurisdiction underSection 83 (4) of A.P. Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions andEndowment Act 30 of 1987 as amended by Act 33 of 2007consequently set aside the same and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.R.K.AMERANDRA KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHANWRIT PETITION NO.28607 of 2008
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Heard Sri P.R.K.Amarendra Kumar, learned counsel for thepetitioner, learned Government Pleader for Endowments and SriV.T.M.Prasad, learned standing counsel for the third respondent-temple.
S r i P.R.K.Amarendra Kumar, learned counsel for thepetitioner, submits that since the petitioner has an alternativeremedy of appeal, he may be permitted to withdraw the writpetition with liberty to avail the alternative remedy.
Liberty is accorded. The Writ Petition is, accordingly,dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
RAMESH RANGANATHAN,J
Dt:30-12-2008usd