Telangana High Court
WP/27164/2023 of Purre Dinesh Kumar Vs The State of Telangana, on 29 December 2023
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 27164 OF 2023 Between: Purre Dinesh Kumar, S/o: Chinnaiah, age.42 yearc,
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 27164 OF 2023
Between:
Purre Dinesh Kumar, S/o: Chinnaiah, age.42 [yearc, ]Occ- Business,R/o.H.No.6-1-205, Kanteshwar, New Bank Colony, Nizamabad Distrct.
...PETITIONER
AND
1The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary, [Home,]Department, Secretariat, at Hyderabad.Department, Secretariat, at Hyderabad.2The Director General of Police, Lakidkapool, Hyderabad, [Telangana.500 004]
3The Commissioner of Police, Nizamabad, Telangana.4The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Nizamabad.(lnvestigation Officer)4The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Nizamabad.(lnvestigation Officer)
5The Station House Officer, lV Town Police Station, Nizamabad [District.]
blppakayala Haridas, S/o: Venkaiah age. 60 [years ][occ. ][Busrness,]RJo Khaleelwadi Nizamabad [(8341 ][1 ]10007),RJo Khaleelwadi Nizamabad [(8341 ][1 ]10007), 7T.Linga Reddy, S/o: Late Malla Reddy, age.58 [years, Occ. ][Business,]R/o Khaleelwadi Nizamabad [([REDACTED]) ][(Owner ][of Bharath ][Lab,]Kaleelwadi, Nizamabad) andR/o Khaleelwadi Nizamabad [([REDACTED]) ][(Owner ][of Bharath ][Lab,]Kaleelwadi, Nizamabad) and Sri.Muriki Ramulu, S/o: Veeresham, age. 60 [years, Occ. ][Business,]R/o Khaleelwadi Nizamabad [([REDACTED])]R/o Khaleelwadi Nizamabad [([REDACTED])]
..RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution [of ][lndia ][praying ][that ][in ][the]circumstances stated in the affidavit [filed ][therewith, ][the ][High ][Court ][may ][be]pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more [particularly ][a ][WRIT ][OF]MANDAMUS the action of the Respondent [No. ][4 ][not Conducting lnvestigation ][in]FIR No.24 OF 2023 Dated.20-01-2023 [against ][the ][Respondent ][No. ][6 ][to ][8 ][and]inaction of the Respondent No.4 as [illegal, arbttrary, ][discriminatory ][and violative ][of]Articles 1 4 and 1 6 of the Constitution [of ][lnd ia.]
lA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to directthe Respondent No.4 to file status report of the investigation in FIR No.24 OF2023 Daled.20-01-2023 pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G RAJESHWAR RAO
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5: AGP FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 6 to 8: NONE APPEARED
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE [SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY]WRIT PETITION No.[27164 ]0F [2023]
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This writ [petition ][is ][filed ][seeking ][following ][relief:]
to issue a Writ Order [or ][Direction ][more]partiatlaorly a \VRIT [OF ][MANDAMUS ][the ][action ][of ][the]RespondentNo.4 not Conducting [Inuestigation ][Ln]FIRNo.24 OF2023 Dated 20.01.2023 [against]theRespondent .lVos. 6 [to ][8 ][and ][otlers ][and ][inaction ][of ][the]Respondent [No. ][4 as itlegol, ][arbitrary, discriminatory ][ond]uiolatiue of Articles [14 ][and ][16 ][of ][the ][Constitution ][of]India..."
2. The case of the [petitioner ][is ][that ][he ][lodged ][a ][complaint']dated 2O.O I.2O23 [against respondent Nos.6 ][to ][8 ][on ][the ][lrle ][of]respondent No.4 and [acting ][on the ][said ][complaint' ][the]respondents-police [have ][registered ][a ][case ][in ][Crime ][No ][24 ][of]2023 tor the offences [punishable ][under ][Sections 5o6 ][of ][IPC ][ancl]3(2) (Va) of the [Scheduled Castes ][and ][the ][Scheduled ][Tribes](Prevention Of Atrocities) Act, [2015' ][The ][grievancc ][oI ][the]petitioner is that even after [registration ][of crime' ][the]n are [not ][conducting ][fair and ][proper]responde ts-police investigation into [the said crime.]
3. The learned Assistant [Government Pleadcr ][for ][Homc]submits that the [investigation ][into ][the ][said ][crime ][is ][under]
progress and the respondents-police will complete the
investigation as early as possible and will file charge sheetbefore the concerned Court.before the concerned Court.
4. [-ln ]view of the said submissions, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, deems itappropriate to dispose of this writ petition directing respondentNo.4 to complete the investigation, as expeditiously as possible,appropriate to dispose of this writ petition directing respondentNo.4 to complete the investigation, as expeditiously as possible,preferably within a period of three (3) months from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this order and file charge sheet before theconcerned Court.
5. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. No order asto costs.
Misccllaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this writpetition shall stand closed.petition shall stand closed.
SD/. MOHD, SANAULLAH [ANSARI]ASSISTANT qEGlgrRAR
/,TRUE COPY/'
\,SECTION OFFICER
To,
1. The Assistant Commissioner of [Police, Nizamabad.(lnvestigation ][Officer)]
2. 3. Two One CC CCs to to [Srr ][GP ]G [for ][Raieshwar ][Home, ][High ][Rao, ][Court ][Advocate ][for ][the ]TOPUC] [State of ]-[Telangana, at]Hyderabad [OUT]4. Two CD CopiesTJGJP
I
I
1
HIGH COURT
DATED:2911212023
ORDERWP.No.27164 of 2023
elHE [S14]/6.ok$'(i [Zt ][fiAR Zrlli]iC,,t**SPATCHEl)
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITIONWITHOUT COSTS.
W