Telangana High Court
WP/2767/2003 of LAKSHMANNA ANANTAPURAND 2 Vs ENDOWMENTS DEPT HYDAND3 on 31 December 2012
CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR Writ Petition No.2767 of 2003 DATED:31.12.2012 Between: Lakshmanna and another. … Petitioners And Government of Andhra Pradesh Endowments Department, Hyderabad and others. ….
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSEAND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
Writ Petition No.2767 of 2003
DATED:31.12.2012
Between:Lakshmanna and another.
… Petitioners
And
Government of Andhra PradeshEndowments Department,Hyderabad and others.
…. Respondents
THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSEAND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
Writ Petition No.2767 of 2003
Order:(per the Hon’ble Chief Justice Sri Pinaki Chandra Ghose)
The petitioners filed the writ petition praying for a mandamus todeclare the action of the 2[nd] respondent in alienating the lands in SurveyNo. 100 of Minehalli Village and Survey No. 33 of Udegolem Village ofKanekal Mandal, Ananatapur District, belonging to Anjaneyaswamy andVenugopalaswamy temples to the beneficiaries of the 4[th] respondent asillegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of the A.P. Charitable andHindu Religious Institutions & Endowments Act, 1987.
This Court while admitting the writ petition on 14.2.2003, passedan interim order directing the 3[rd] respondent not to distribute theaforementioned lands.
While denying the allegations of the petitioners, Respondent Nos.2 and 4 have filed counter affidavit. In Paragraph-7 of the counteraffidavit, it is stated thus:
“In reply to Para No.6 and 7 of the WritAffidavit it is submitted that as reported by theTahsildar, Kanekal in his Lr. Rc.A/149/2010,dt.3.8.2010 the land an extent of Ac.9.78 in Sy.No.100 of Meenahalli village and 3.11 acres inSy. No.33 of 43-Udegolam Village of KanekalMandal was endowed in favour ofAnjaneyaswamy Devastanam andVenugopalaswamy Devastanam templesrespectively. Further, it is submitted that theabove lands were not proposed and purchased under Land Purchase Scheme by S.C.Corporation, Anantapur. The above lands are inpossession and enjoyment of the respectivedeities as on date.”
In view of the aforesaid averments made by the respondents inthe counter affidavit, Sri O. Manohar Reddy, learned counsel for thepetitioners submits that he does not wish to press the writ petition.
Recording the submission of the learned counsel, the writ petitionis dismissed as not pressed. No costs.
__________________________PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, HCJ
______________________
VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR,J31.12.2012
pnb