Telangana High Court
CRP/4489/2015 of G LALITH MOHAN,HYD Vs SMT.K.LALITHA, HYD AND FOUR OTHERS on 31 December 2021
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4489 OF 2015 Petition under Article 227 ol lhe Constitution of lndia aggrieved by the order dated
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4489 OF 2015
Petition under Article 227 ol lhe Constitution of lndia aggrieved by the orderdated 03.02.2015 in 1.A.No.1063 of 2013 in l.A.No.89'1 oI 2011 in 1.A.No.1482 of [2006]in O.S.No.593 of 1995 on the file of the Court of the lV Senior Civil Judge, City [Civil]Court, Hyderabad.
Between:
G. Lalith Mohan, S/o. G.Badri Narayana, aged 43 [years, ]Occ: Employee, [RJo]Domalguda, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER/PETITIONER
AND
1. Smt. K.Lalitha, W/o. K.Laxmaiah, aged 62 [years, ]Occ: Housewife,Fl/o. 1-2-365/9, presently residing at Puranabagh, Towi Chowki, Hyderabad.Fl/o. 1-2-365/9, presently residing at Puranabagh, Towi Chowki, Hyderabad.
2. Smt. Vodhela Shankunthala, W/o. Vodhela Rajalingam, aged 78 [years, ]Occ:Housewife, Died per Lrs. R3 and R4.Housewife, Died per Lrs. R3 and R4.
3. Sri. Vodhela Viswatham, S/o. Vodhela Rajalingam, aged 48 [years, ]Occ:BusinessBusiness
4. Smt. Vodhela Rajeshwari, W/o. Vodhela Sangaiah, aged about 60 [years, ]Occ:Housewife,Housewife, (2 to 4 are residents of H.No.1-2-365/9, Poolbagh, Domalguda, Hyderabad-500029.)500029.)
5. Sultan Ahmed [Muzawar Ali, S/o. Salamuddin Muzawar, aged 60 [years, ]Occ:Business, Rl/o. Not Known, Hyderabad.Business, Rl/o. Not Known, Hyderabad.
(The respondents 2 to 5 are not necessary parties to this petition)
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS
CRPMP. NO: 5939 OF 2015
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in theaffidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be [pleased ]to stay all further [proceedings]in O.S.No.356 of 2008 on the file of the lV Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court,Hydera bad.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI D. JAGADESHWAR RAO
Counsel for the Respondents: NONE APPEARED
The Court made the following: ORDER
To,
THE H( IN'BLE SMT. JUSTICE P. SREE SUDHA
crvll, TEVISION PETITION No.4489 of 20tS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This C.F.p. is filed questioning the order passed inLA.No.1O63 of 2013 in I.A.No.89 1 of 2Ot1 in I.A.No. 1482 of2006 in O.S.l o.593 of 1995 on the file ol IV Senior CivilJudge, City Cir il Court, Hyderabad.
As per th: case status information, O.S.No.593 of 1995on the file of the IV Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court,Hyderabad itse f was disposed of on 1 L.8.2O1T .
Therefore this Civil Revision petition is dismissed asinfructuous. N r order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitionsinfructuous. N r order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitionspending, if any shall stand closed.
SDIB.SAWAVATHIASSISTANT REGISTRARi\ ,\-'SECTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPY'
1. The lV SeniorCivil [Judge, City Civil Court, ][Hyderabad.]
2. One CC to Sri [D. ][J ][rgadeshwar ][Rao, ][Advocate ]IOPUC]
3. Two CD Copies
4. One Spare CoPygbrgbr
\
HIGH COURT
DATED: 3111212t21
)j"$!,i,:;,li\qb'
ORDER
CRP.No.4489 o I 2015
DISMISSING THE CIUL REVISION PETITIONAS INFRUCTU OUSWITHOUT CO!;TS