Telangana High Court
WP/18668/2004 of V.Venkata Subba Rao Vs The Government of A.P on 29 December 2004
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION NO : 18668 of 2004 Between: V.Venkata Subba Rao, S/o.Satyanarayana Murthy, aged 36 years,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU
WRIT PETITION NO : 18668 of 2004
Between:
V.Venkata Subba Rao, S/o.Satyanarayana Murthy,aged 36 years, R/o.Tanukuwada, Kajuluru Mandal, East Godavari District.
AND
..... PETITIONER
1. The Government of A.P., Cooperation Department, rep. by its Secretary, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The Commissioner for Cooperation,
Government of A.P.Hyderabad.
3. The District Cooperative Officer, E.G.District at Kakinada.
4. The Divisional Cooperative Officer, Kakinada, E.G.District.
5. The Srirama Tanukuwada PACS, Tanukuwada, Kajuluru Mandal, E.G.District, rep. by its Chairman/PIC.
....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased toissue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ ofMandamus declaring the impugned action of the respondents 3 and 4 in issuingdirections to the 5th respondent to terminate the petitioners from service andconsequential action of the 5th respondent in terminating the service of the petitioner vide proceedings dated 11-9-2004 w.e.f 31.7.2004 as highly illegal, arbitrary andviolative of Art.14 of the Constitution of India apart from contrary to the provisions ofA.P. Shops and Establishment Act and violative of Principles of natural justice andpass such other order or orders.
Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.G.V.SHIVAJI
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR COOPERATION
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that he filed representation dated13/12/2004 before the 4[th] respondent and the same has to be considered by the 4[th]respondent in accordance with the law.
So, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed ofwith a direction to the 4[th] respondent to take appropriate decision and orders on therepresentation of the petitioner dated 13/12/2004 in accordance with law within aperiod of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.
Date: 29[th] December 2004.
BSB
_____________
K.C.BHANU,J.
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
// TRUE COPY //
SECTION OFFICER
1. The Secretary, Cooperation Department, The Government of A.P., Secretariat, Hyderabad. Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The Commissioner for Cooperation,
Government of A.P.Hyderabad.
3. The District Cooperative Officer, E.G.District at Kakinada.
4. The Divisional Cooperative Officer, Kakinada, E.G.District.
5. The Chairman/PIC, The Srirama Tanukuwada PACS, Tanukuwada, Kajuluru Mandal, E.G.District,.
6. Two CCs to the Government Pleader for Cooperation, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (OUT).
7. Two CD copies