Telangana High Court

WP/6563/1994 of WIDIA (INDIA) LTD. Vs SEC. APSEB HYD. on 22 August 1994

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 6563 of 1995 Between: 1 B.Ch. Pandu Ranga Rao son of Venkaiah R/o.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA

WRIT PETITION NO : 6563 of 1995

Between:

1 B.Ch. Pandu Ranga Rao son of Venkaiah

R/o. Mallavaram: 534 275, Narsapur Mandal, West Godavari District.

2 Choppala Joseph Raju S/o. John Williams, R/o. Srungavruksham, Chinapet, Palakoderu Mandal, West Godavari Dist.

AND

..... PETITIONERS

1 S.M.B.T.A.V. & S.N. Degree College, rep. by its Secretary and correspondent, Veeravasaram-534 245, West Godavari District, 2 The Director of Higher Education, A.P. Hyderabad.

3 The State of A.P., rep. by its Secretary, Education Department, Secretariat Buildings, Saifabad, Hyderabad.

.....RESPONDENTS

Page 1 of 2

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased toissue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature ofWrit of Mandamus, declaring that the petitioners are entitled to be regularised in theposts of Typist and Lab Attender held respectively by them in the first respondent'sCollege and issue a consequently direction to the respondents to consider the caseof the petitioners for regularization in the posts of Typist and Lab Attender heldrespectively by them with all consequential and attendant benefits from the dates oftheir initial appointment; For the Petitioners: MR.R.BRIZ MOHAN SINGH, Advocate For the Respondent No.1: MR.D.V.SITARAMAMURTHY, AdvocateFor the Respondents 2 and 3: None appeared The Court made the following :

ORAL ORDER

A representation is made on behalf of both the learned counselfor the petitioner and the respondents that the matter hasbecome infructuous.

Recording the same, this writ petition is dismissed asinfructuous. No costs.

_________________

25[th] November,2004

vp

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To

1. The Secretary and Correspondent, S.M.B. T.A. V. and S.N. DegreeCollege, Veeravasaram – 534 245, West Godavari District,College, Veeravasaram – 534 245, West Godavari District,

2. The Director of Higher Education, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad,

3. The Secretary, Education Department, State of Andhra Pradesh,Secretariat building, Saifabad, Hyderabad

4. 2 C.D. copies.

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead