Telangana High Court

WP/27547/2005 of Jillela Ananda Rao, Vs The District Collector, on 27 December 2005

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No. 27547 of 2005 Between: Jillela Ananda Rao ..... PETITIONER AND The District Collector,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FIVE

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH

WRIT PETITION No. 27547 of 2005

Between:

Jillela Ananda Rao

AND

The District Collector,

E.G.District at Kakinada and 3 others

.....RESPONDENTS

..... PETITIONER

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Seeking a Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 1 to 3 in not considering the representation of the petitioner dated 02.08.2005 andnot initiating any inquiry against the 4[th] respondent, as illegal and arbitrary, thepresent writ petition is filed.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader forCooperation.

The petitioner submits that he is a member of the Mutyala Memorial CollectiveCooperative Agricultural Society, Kesavadasupalem village, Sakhinetipalli Mandalof East Godavari District. The said society was established for the welfare andupliftment of members of the Society. The Government has issued a joint patta for anextent of Ac.572.00, out of which Ac.372.00 of land is assigned fromKesavadasupalem village and Ac.198.00 of land is assigned from Antharvedi andGondi villages, and ever since all the members of the society have been cultivatingthe said lands by investing their hard earned money.

It is stated that the 4[th] respondent became the President of the said Societyand he is continuing for the last 20 years. It is further stated that the 4[th] respondenthas committed several serious irregularities and became a rich by his illegal, corruptand immoral activities. In this regard the petitioner and other members made arepresentation to the respondents 1 to 3 on 02.08.2005, noting down as many asseven irregularities said to have been committed by the 4[th] respondent, and the 1[st] respondent has also made an endorsement on theirrepresentation and directed the 3[rd] respondent to conduct enquiry.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the 1[st] respondent may authorize the 3[rd] respondent to conduct proper enquiry on therepresentation of the petitioner dated 02.08.2005, in accordance with law, aftergiving a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner as well as to the 4[th] respondent, and also may take necessary action according to the report, that may be filed by theEnquiry Officer.

With the above observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.

Dated: 27.12.2005

Dsr

________________

V.ESWARAIAH,J

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead