Telangana High Court
WP/45976/2016 of G.Srinivasa Rao, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 30 December 2016
SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.45976 OF 2016 DATED : 30.12.2016 Between : G.Srinivasa Rao S/o.Kotaiah, Aged 42 yrs, Occu : Agriculture, R/o.Yerrabalem, Mangalagiri Mandal, Guntur District & 2 others. .. Petitioners And The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep., by its Principal
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No.45976 OF 2016
DATED : 30.12.2016
Between :
G.Srinivasa Rao S/o.Kotaiah, Aged 42 yrs, Occu : Agriculture, R/o.Yerrabalem, Mangalagiri Mandal, Guntur District & 2 others.
.. Petitioners
And
The State of Andhra Pradesh,
Rep., by its Principal Secretary,
Revenue Department,
Secretariat, Velagapudi,
Amaravathi, Guntur District & others.
.. Respondents
This court made the following :
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No.45976 OF 2016
ORDER :
Heard. With the consent of both the counsel, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage.
2. Petitioners claim to own small pieces of land in Sy.No.502, Yerrabalem Village, Mangalagiri mandal, Guntur District. With respect to the extent of ownership, petitioners have agreed under Land Pooling system floated by the Government under the Capital Regional Development Area. According to the petitioners, they have all converted the agricultural lands into house plots and therefore, their lands have to be treated as house plots while determining the amount payable or allocation of alternative lands, after the development, whereas, the authorities are treating their lands as agricultural lands. Petitioners have submitted their representations which were acknowledged by the competent authority on 01.12.2016, ventilating their grievance on this issue. Petitioners contend that the said representations are yet to be disposed of, this writ petition is filed.
3. Having regard to the fact that representations submitted by the petitioners are pending consideration, without expressing any opinion on merits, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the 3[rd]respondent-Deputy Collector, Capital Regional Development Authority (CRDA), to consider the representations of the petitioners and pass appropriate orders as warranted by law, and communicate the decision to the petitioners by a reasoned order, within a period of three (3) weeks, from the date of receipt of copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.
30[th] December, 2016 Rds
__________________
P.NAVEEN RAO,J