Telangana High Court
WA/2046/2004 of Shoukat Baig S/o Mriza Shoukat Baig Vs Manonmaniam Sundaranar University on 30 December 2004
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI DEVINDER GUPTA, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NARAYANA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 2046 of 2004 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI DEVINDER GUPTA, THE CHIEF JUSTICEand THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NARAYANA REDDY
WRIT APPEAL NO : 2046 of 2004
(Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated10/11/2004 in WVMP No.1763 of 2004 in WPMP No.8849 of 2004 in WP NO : 6820OF 2004 on the file of the High Court.)
Between:
1 Shoukat Baig S/o Mriza Shoukat Baig
R/o Hyderabad
2 Naveen Bharadwaz S/o Ram Gopal Sharma
r/o R.K. Puram, Secunderabad-56
3 Mohd. Masharuddin S/o Mohd. Moizuddin
R/o Hyderabad
4 Abdul Jaker S/o Abdul Khader,
Tolichwki, Hyderabad
5 Muzufar Ahmed S/o Mumtaz Ahmed
R/o Hyderabad
6 J. Mallikharjuna Rao S/o Veeraswamy
R/o Penamaluru, (PT) (MD) Krishna
7 K. Ranga Prasad, S/o Seetharamayya
R/o Vidyadharapuram, Vijayawada
8 V. Sailaja D/o V.V. Subba Rao
r/o Vidyadharapuram, Vijayawada
9 M. Siva Krishna S/o M.V. Subba Rao
R/o Gannavaram (MD) Krishna District
10 V. Raghu S/o Padmanabha Rao
r/o Tadepalli (M.D) Guntur District
11 P. Sudhir Kumar, S/o P. Satyanarayana R/o Patamata, Vijayawada 12 B. Satish S/o B. Sankara Rao R.o Chittinagar, Vijayawada 13 Talari Sreenivasulu S/o T. Rangaswamy R/o Genegandla, Kurnool District 14 M. Sreenivasulu S/o M.Ramaiah R/o B/B 100, B Camp Post, Kurnool District 15 G. Paramesh S/o Mareppa R/o Gonegandla, Kurnool District 16 V. Magaraja Rao S/o V. Rama Murthy R/o Gonegandla, Kurnool District 17 S. Rambabu S/o Thimmanna R/o Madannapuram, Mahaboobnagar District 18 V. Devendra Murthy S/o V. Ramamurthy R/o Gonegondla, Kurnool District 19 K. Ravi S/o K. Gowrappa R/o Mehaboobnagar 20 S. Venugopal S/o Changaiah R/o Rajampet, Cuddapah District
AND
..... APPELLANTS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Manonmaniam Sundaranar University Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu rep byRegistrar.Registrar.
2. The Director, Distance & Continuing Education, ManonmainiamSundaranar University, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu.Sundaranar University, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu.
3. Kranti Institute of Information Technology & Sciences Cuddapah, rep byCoordinator, K. Khadarvali.Coordinator, K. Khadarvali.
4. R.S. Educational Society, KT Road, Tirupathi rep by Co-ordinator, SridharReddy.Reddy.
.....RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Appellants: Mr.S.Ramachander Rao for MR.K.R.PRABHAKARCounsel for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2: MR.K.SRINIVASAMURTHYCounsel for the Respondent Nos.3 and 4: Mr.Suresh Kumar Reddy The Court made the following :
ORAL ORDER: (per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice)
W.P.No.6820 of 2004 was filed in which an interim order was passed.Subsequent thereto, W.P.No.8855 of 2004 was filed. In view of the interim orderpassed in W.P.No.6820 of 2004, same interim order was passed in W.P.No.8855 of2004 also. In W.P.No.8855 of 2004 direction was to hear the writ petition along withW.P.No.6820 of 2004. Learned single Judge has, by the order impugned in thepresent appeal, on 10[th] November, 2004 vacated the interim order in W.P.No.6820of 2004 whereas in W.P.No.8855 of 2004, the interim order is continuing anddirection has been issued to take up the miscellaneous application also along withthe main writ petition for hearing. Both the writ petitions are pending before the samelearned single Judge.
Conclusion
In order to maintain parity, in similar matters, of passing orders, usuallymatters are taken up before the same court and when direction is to take up the twomatters together, there cannot be a different procedure followed of vacating the orderin one case and continuing the interim order in the other case. In that view of thematter, the impugned order passed by learned single Judge on 10[th] November,2004 deserves to be set aside with direction to take up both the writ petitionstogether and first take up the vacate applications in both the writ petitions forconsideration and pass orders simultaneously in both the cases.
Accordingly, writ appeal is allowed, impugned order is set aside and learnedsingle Judge will proceed to hear and dispose of WVMP No.1763 of 2004 andWVMP No.1762 of 2004 filed in W.P.Nos.6820 and 8855 of 2004 respectivelysimultaneously. Parties to appear before the learned single Judge on8-2-2005.
___________________
DEVINDER GUPTA, CJ
30-12-2004
_____________________
M.NARAYANA REDDY, J
Tvr
To
1. The Registrar, Manonmaniam Sundaranar University Tirunelveli, TamilNadu.Nadu.
2. The Director, Distance & Continuing Education, ManonmainiamSundaranar University, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu.Sundaranar University, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu.
3. 2 CD copies.
4. One copy to Section Officer, Writ Filing Section, High Court of A.P.,Hyderabad.Hyderabad.