Telangana High Court
CC/1646/2011 of P.Chengaiah Vs Mr. J.Pratap Reddy on 30 December 2011
SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Contempt Case No.1646 of 2011 ORDER: The petitioner filed W.P.No.23225 of 2011 stating that the respondent did not consider his representation, dated 02.02.2010 for reinstatement into service. The writ petition was disposed of on 18.08.2011 directing the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDYContempt Case No.1646 of 2011
ORDER:
The petitioner filed W.P.No.23225 of 2011stating that the respondent did not consider hisrepresentation, dated 02.02.2010 for reinstatementinto service. The writ petition was disposed of on18.08.2011 directing the respondent herein to passorders within a period of six weeks. This contemptcase is filed alleging that the said order of this Courtwas not implemented.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitionerand the learned counsel for the respondent.
The contempt case was filed on 02.12.2011. However, it is brought to the notice of this Court thaton 26.11.2011 itself the respondent passed anorder rejecting the representation of the petitioner.In case, the petitioner feels aggrieved by the saidorder, he has to work out his remedies.
Therefore, the contempt case is closed.There shall be no order as to costs.
__________
30.12.2011
JSU
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY
JSU
Contempt Case No.1646 of 2011
Date: 30.12.2011