Telangana High Court
CRLP/11005/2009 of Gondhi Janardhan Gupta [A-1] Vs Mukthipudi Prabhakar Rao on 31 December 2009
SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION No.11005 OF 2009 ORDER: This Criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is filed by the petitioner – accused No.1 seeking to quash the proceedings in Crime No.297 of 2009 of II Town Police Station, Anantapur, Anantapur District,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDYCRIMINAL PETITION No.11005 OF 2009ORDER:
This Criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is filed by thepetitioner – accused No.1 seeking to quash the proceedings in CrimeNo.297 of 2009 of II Town Police Station, Anantapur, AnantapurDistrict, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 324 readwith 34 IPC and Section 3 (1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes andScheduled Tribes(Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
2. Heard.
3. In view of the nature of allegations and in the circumstancesof the case, it is directed that the petitioner shall not be arrested tillfiling of charge sheet, if any. The investigation and consequentialsteps on the basis of result of investigation shall go on.
4. The Criminal Petition is accordingly disposed of.
31[st] December 2009Note:Issue copy of the orderwithin two days.
B/o. Rns
___________________
P. SWAROOP REDDY, J.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDYCRIMINAL PETITION No.10561 OF 2009ORDER:
This Criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is filed seekingto modify the orders dated 27.11.2009 passed by the I AdditionalMetropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad in Crl.M.P.No.1011 of 2009in C.C.No.6 of 2002 and permit the petitioner – accused No.88 to leavethe country for a period of eight months from the last week of January,2010 to last week of September, 2010 for pilgrimage on foot byreducing the condition of security deposit of Rs.1,00,000/-.
3. Heard both sides.
4. The petitioner wants to go for pilgrimage by foot. As such,time granted by the Court below till February 2010 may not besufficient. Hence, the time granted vide orders dated 27.11.2009 bythe learned I Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad isextended till the end of September 2010. Other conditions imposed bythe learned Sessions Judge, shall remain unaltered.
5. The Criminal Petition is accordingly allowed.
16[th] December 2009
Rns
___________________
P. SWAROOP REDDY, J.