Telangana High Court
WP/29092/2008 of R. Lalith Mohan Vs Govt. of A.P. on 31 December 2008
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 29092 of 2008 Between: R.Lalith Mohan ..... PETITIONER AND Government of A.P. rep. By its
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT
PRESENTTHE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINIWRIT PETITION NO : 29092 of 2008
Between:R.Lalith Mohan
AND
..... PETITIONER
Government of A.P. rep. By its Principal Secretary and two others
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying thatin the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Courtwill be pleased to Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.P.SRI HARSHA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following :
THE HON’BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI
W.P.NO.29092 of2008
ORDER
This writ petition is filed aggrieved by the alleged action of therespondents in interfering with the possession and enjoyment of thepetitioner in respect of plot bearing No.48 situated in Sy.No.74/3admeasuring 25 square yards forming part of M/s.Ravi Co-operativeHousing Society Limited, East Maredpally, Secunderabad andinterfering with the construction activities in the plot.
Page 1 of 2
When the matter is taken up for consideration it is brought to mynotice by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in identicalcircumstances W.P.No.9037 of 2007 was filed by one of the purchasersfrom M/s.Ravi Co-operative Housing Society Limited and this court afterhearing both the parties by an order dated.05-06-2007 disposed of thesaid writ petition directing the respondents not to interfere with thepossession of the petitioner therein. It was also observed as under:- “it shall however be open to MRO to implead the petitioner herein if not already impleaded in the pending L.G.C and seekappropriate orders from the special Court. This Court furtherrequests Special Court constituted under Andhra PradeshGrabbing(Prohibition) Act,1982, to dispose of LGC No.167 of1997 expeditiously whether or not the petitioner is impleaded bythe revenue officials.
The writ petition with the above observations isaccordingly disposed of. No costs.”
The learned Government Pleader for Revenue who accepted notice for the respondents has not disputed the fact that the petitioner herein is also similarly situated.
Accordingly, following the order in W.P.No.9037 of 2007 this writpetition is disposed of in terms of the order extracted above. No costs.
_____________
G.ROHINI,J
31[ST] December,2008*TSNR
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…