Telangana High Court

WP/24546/2009 of Padmaja Lodge AND Restaurant Vs The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation on 31 December 2009

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE NINTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE :PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 24546 of 2009 Between: Padmaja Lodge & Restaurant 9-4-47, Opp. Railway

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE NINTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE

:PRESENT:

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY

WRIT PETITION NO : 24546 of 2009

Between:

Padmaja Lodge & Restaurant 9-4-47, Opp. Railway Station, Rep. by its Partner, Sri N. Krishna Murthy, S/o. N.K. Venkat Rao, R/o. 27, Gunrock Enclave, Kharkhana, Secunderabad.

..... Petitioner

AND

1 The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its Special Officer &

Commissioner, Tankbund Road, Hyderabad.

2 The Additional Commissioner (T&T), The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad.

3 The Additional Commissioner, Advertisement, The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad.

4 U.S.M. Business Systems Private Limited 1-8-319/2, Patigadda Road, Behind Ford Showroom, Secunderabad.

.....Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstancesstated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order ordirection more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring theproceedings No. 245/Ad1/Advt./GHMC-2008-2009/474-2 dated 3-11-2009 of theCommissioner and Special Officer GHMC issued by the Additional Commissioner (T&T)the 2nd respondent and demand notices issued by the 4th respondent herein demandingadvertisement fee as illegal, arbitrary, capricious and in violation of the principles of naturaljustice.

The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed insupport there of and the High Court order dated 13/11/2009 made herein and upon hearingthe arguments of Sri P.SRIHARI, Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri R.RamachandraReddy, SC for GHMC, for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3, the Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Post on 30.11.2009.

Interim order is extended by two (2) weeks.

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

// TRUE COPY //

for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

To

1 The Special Officer & Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Tankbund Road, Hyderabad.

2 The Additional Commissioner (T&T), The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad. Hyderabad.

3 The Additional Commissioner, Advertisement, The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad.

4 U.S.M. Business Systems Private Limited 1-8-319/2, Patigadda Road, Behind Ford Showroom, Secunderabad

5. One CC to Sri P.Srihari, Advocate, (OPUC)

6. One spare copy.

JU

HIGH COURT

LNRJ

POST ON 30.11.2009

ORDER

WP NO. 24546/2009

EXTENSION.

Drafted by JUDt. 20.11.2009.

HIGH COURT

LNRJ

DT. 19.11.2009

POST ON 30.11.2009

ORDER

WP NO. 24546/2009

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead