Telangana High Court
CC/1291/2003 of L.L. Narayana E.361413 Vs Sri R.P. Singh on 19 December 2003
COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) MONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND THREE : PRESENT : THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE : GODA RAGHURAM CONTEMPT CASE No. 1291 Of 2003 Between: 1. L.L. Narayana .. Petitioner AND 1. Sri R.P. Singh, The
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESHAT HYDERABAD
(ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)
MONDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND THREE: PRESENT :
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE : GODA RAGHURAM
CONTEMPT CASE No. 1291 Of 2003
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. L.L. Narayana .. Petitioner
AND
3. The Regional Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C., Nizamabad Region at Nizamabad.
4. Sri Chennappa Reddy, The Depot Manager, A.P.S.R..T.C.,Vidyadharapuram Depot, Krishna District. ..RespondentsVidyadharapuram Depot, Krishna District. ..Respondents (R3 not necessary party)
To
3. Sri Chennappa Reddy, The Depot Manager, A.P.S.R..T.C.,Vidyadharapuram Depot, Krishna District. Vidyadharapuram Depot, Krishna District.
WHEREAS the Petitioners herein has presented a petition to this court underSection 10, 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for committing the abovenamed Respondent/s for Contempt of Court for disobeying and not complying withthe directions of the High Court passed in WP.No.3291 of 2003 dated 25.02.2003.
AND WHEREAS this Court while dispensing with presence ofRespondent(s) hath this day directed issue of notice(s) to the above namedRespondent(s) to show cause why, in the circumstances stated in the petition andthe affidavit filed in support thereof (copies of which are annexed hereto) they shouldnot be punished for contempt of court; Now : Therefore you namely ;
3. Sri Chennappa Reddy, The Depot Manager, A.P.S.R..T.C., Vidyadharapuram Depot, Krishna District.
BE AND HEREBY are directed to show cause why in the circumstances stated inthe petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof, you should not be punished forcontempt of court ; Sd/- P. VANAKUMARI, REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
..2
..2..
To
1. The Chief Judge, City Civil Court,Hyderabad .(in duplicate along with copies of petition and affidavit for service on theRespondent NO.1 and return before 05.12.2003 )2 The District Judge, Krishna District at Machilipatnam (In duplicate along with copies of petition and affidavit for service on the respondents Nos. 2 & 4 and return before 05.12.2003)3 Sri R.P. Singh, Managing Director, A.P.S.R.T.C., Musheerabad, Hyd. (BY SPECIAL MESSENGER ) (ALONG WITH A COPIES OF PETITION AND AFFIDAVIT )4 Sri Sudhakar, Regional Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C.,,Krishna Region atVijayawada.
5. Sri Chennappa Reddy, Depot Manager, A.P.S.R..T.C.,Vidyadharapuram Depot, Krishna District. ( 4 & 5 BY SPEED POST) ( ALONG WITH A COPIES OF PETITION AND AFFIDAVIT )
6. One spare copy.
D/KGT/RV
High Court
GR.J
NOTE: Post this case on 05.12.2003
NoticeCC.No. 1291 of 2003
Dispensing with the presenceOf the respondents.