Telangana High Court
FCA/119/2013 of Dindi Laxmi Vs Dindi Narsaiah on 29 December 2016
SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL F.C.A.M.P.No.474 of 2016 in/and FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.119 of 2013 29.12.2016 Between: Dindi Laxmi ..Appellant And Dindi Narsaiah and others ..Respondents Counsel for the appellant: Mr.D.V.Chalapathi Rao
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE M.S.K.JAI SWAL
F.C.A.M.P.No.474 of 2016in/ and
FAMI LY COURT APPEAL No.119 of 2013
Between:
29.12.2016
Dindi Laxmi
And
..Appellant
Dindi Narsaiah and others
..Respondents
Counsel for the appellant: Mr.D.V.Chalapathi Rao Counsel for the respondents: Mr.Gadi Praveen Kumar, for Mr.A.K.Jayaprakash Rao The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT:(Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy)
The Family Court Appeal arises out of the order, dated 29.09.2011, in O.P.No.97 of 2009 on the file of the Judge, Family Court, Warangal, to the extent the appellant is not satisfied with the quantum of maintenance awarded by the Court below. The appellant filed F.C.A.M.P.No.474 of 2016 praying for recording of compromise between the parties in terms of the joint compromise memo, dated 20.10.2016, signed by both the parties.
2. At the hearing both the parties are personally present and reiterated the terms of the aforementioned joint compromise memo.
3. In the light of the above facts, F.C.A.M.P.No.474 of 2016 is allowed and F.C.A.No.119 of 2013 is disposed of in terms of the joint compromise memo, dated 20.10.2016, with the direction that the same shall stand incorporated in this judgment.
4. As a sequel to disposal of the appeal, interim order, dated 04.07.2013, in F.C.A.M.P.No.158 of 2013 as extended on 30.08.2013 is vacated and F.C.A.M.P.No.158 of 2013 filed by the appellant for interim relief shall stand dismissed as infructuous.
___________________________
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J
29[th] December, 2016
______________________
M.S.K.JAI SWAL, J