Telangana High Court
WP/41055/2014 of M/s. Radha Smelters Limited, Vs The Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana on 31 December 2014
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.41055 of 2014 Date:31.12.2014 Between: M/s Radha Smelters Limited, Shankarampet Village and Mandal, reptd by its Managing Director- Sunil Saraf ..... Petitioner And: The Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana Limited, reptd by its Managing
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDYWRIT PETITION No.41055 of 2014
Date:31.12.2014
Between:
M/s Radha Smelters Limited,Shankarampet Village and Mandal,reptd by its Managing Director-Sunil Saraf
..... Petitioner
And:
The Southern Power Distribution Companyof Telangana Limited, reptd by its ManagingDirector, Hyderabad and two others.
.....Respondents
Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri D.V.Nagarjuna Babu Counsel for the Respondents: Sri O.Manoher Reddy The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to setaside letter No.SE/OP/MDK/SAO/HT/D.No.1230/2014,dated 09.09.2014, of respondent No.2, whereby he hascalled upon the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.5,25,715/-towards the total amount payable on final settlement.
The grievance of the petitioner is that no detailshave been furnished by respondent No.2 in support of thesaid demand; that though representations were made by iton 26.11.2014 and 02.12.2014 to respondent No.3 tofurnish such details, so far the same was not responded toby the said respondent; and that the respondents arethreatening to disconnect the power supply to its ServiceConnection for non-payment of the said amount.
In the light of the grievance of the petitioner that the respondents have not supplied the working/calculationsheet and MRI data and no reasons have been assignedfor raising the impugned demand, respondent No.3 isdirected to supply the necessary details sought for by thepetitioner in its representations, dated 2611.2014 and02.12.2014. The petitioner is left free to avail appropriateremedy, if it is not satisfied with the working/calculationsheet and MRI data to be supplied by respondent No.3. For a period of two weeks from the date of supply of suchdetails by respondent No.3, the power supply to thepetitioner’s Service Connection shall not be disconnectedfor non-payment of the sum of Rs.5,25,715/- asdemanded in the impugned letter, dated 09.09.2014. Subject to the above direction, the Writ Petition isdisposed of.
As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition,WPMP.No.51411 of 2014 filed by the petitioner for interimrelief is disposed of as infructuous.
___________________________
JUSTICEC.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
31[st] December 2014DR